Search for: "Doe v. Doe" Results 5881 - 5900 of 137,455
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2007, 11:22 pm
Yesterday, the Canadian Federal Court issued an opinion in the case Canadian Council for Refugees, Canadian Council of Churches, Amnesty International, and John Doe v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 4:08 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) From Mick Haig Prods. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 4:03 am
One Florida appellate district follows Hudson not suppressing a violation of knock-and-announce while recognizing that another does not (Cable v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 12:36 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Puig v New York State Police, 212 AD3d 1025, the Appellate Division said the administrative record and the DOE's affidavits demonstrate "that the descriptions provided are insufficient for purposes of extracting or retrieving the requested document[s] from the virtual files through an electronic word search ... [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 12:36 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Puig v New York State Police, 212 AD3d 1025, the Appellate Division said the administrative record and the DOE's affidavits demonstrate "that the descriptions provided are insufficient for purposes of extracting or retrieving the requested document[s] from the virtual files through an electronic word search ... [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 10:28 am by Donald Maurice
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued an opinion today vacating its earlier decision in Hunstein v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:00 pm
The US Supreme Court issued its decision on June 17 in the case of Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 5:13 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The BPAI affirmed an obviousness rejection in Ex parte Law by reference to KSR:[t]he combination of familiar elements according to known methods is likely to be obvious when it does no more than yield predictable results KSR v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 9:32 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) ruled today in Thaler v. [read post]