Search for: "Greene v. Greene"
Results 5881 - 5900
of 8,860
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2012, 3:57 pm
See Harisiades v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 12:20 pm
(The name of the case is Mark v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 8:43 am
<> Venancio Aguasanta Arias v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 7:15 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
That is also the case, for example, when that item of evidence is accompanied by other evidence (see, to that effect, judgments of 9 December 2014, Inter-Union Technohandel v OHIM – Gumersport Mediterranea de Distribuciones (PROFLEX), T 278/12, EU:T:2014:1045, paragraphs 64 to 69, and of 7 September 2016, Victor International v EUIPO – Ovejero Jiménez and Becerra Guibert (VICTOR), T 204/14, not published, EU:T:2016:448, paragraph 74).Another interesting plea,… [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 1:20 pm
(i.e., a “Green Card holder”). [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 12:40 pm
Sutton v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
We observe in closing that in Dobbs v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 4:41 am
The case is Sugartown Worldwide LLC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Young v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
In the wonderful case of Sopo v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 2:01 am
| Negative decision for anti-HIV therapy patent: Merck Sharpe & Dohme v Shionogi Co Limited | Book review: Copyright and E-Learning | Friday Fantasies | Fontem see their patent “vaporised” – the dangers of added matter | BREAKING: Antidote found for poisonous priorities | Around the IP blogs | AIPPI Congress Report 5: Antitrust and Pharma - seeking a balance | When the Rolling Stones visited 2120 South Michigan Avenue in Chicago | No measure of success in passing off… [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 11:36 am
Greene, 710 F3d. 1189, 1202 (11th Cir.2013). [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 10:45 am
The Fifth Circuit’s recent abortion decision in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:40 am
They wanted to use originalism to overturn Plessy v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 4:24 am
The Court began by noting that, in order to assess whether the distinctive character of the Mark had been altered, it needed to carry out an assessment of the distinctive and dominant character of the added elements, based of the intrinsic qualities of each of those elements, as well as of the relative position of the various elements within the arrangement of the mark (Lidl Stiftung v EUIPO – Plásticos Hidrosolubles (green cycles), T‑78/19).It found, in… [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 6:30 am
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
In the wonderful case of Sopo v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 5:40 am
If the light is green, it cannot be consumer fraud to drive through the intersection. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 4:23 pm
This means liberals must abandon Roe v. [read post]
