Search for: "In Re Brand"
Results 5881 - 5900
of 14,127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2016, 2:00 pm
If you're a citizen or resident of Pakistan, you can reach out to the Senate via Twitter using our PECB action alert. [read post]
20 May 2016, 11:02 am
Probably the smart thing would be to forget about dilution, which the world lived without since Creation, and focus on tight brand building and enforcement against real infringements. [read post]
20 May 2016, 10:31 am
Limited Brands, Inc., 555 F.3d 984, 993(Fed. [read post]
20 May 2016, 8:40 am
Said: that may be how we understand dilution; brands get to assert certain things. [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:00 am
You’ll find major brand names plus enjoy free shipping. [read post]
20 May 2016, 5:10 am
Well, they’re not wrong. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:33 pm
Second, it evaluated the impact of Bartlett and Mensing on preemption of these “lack of efficacy claims” for a branded prescription drug. [read post]
19 May 2016, 11:04 am
We do the job we’re paid to do. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:45 am
The technology at issue is known as a “Stingray,” a brand name for what’s generically called a cell site simulator or IMSI catcher. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:34 am
Without a robust and well-functioning nominative use doctrine, trademark owners can have too much control over their brands–they can shut down the advertisement of complementary or competitive offers and potentially even critical scrutiny of the brands. [read post]
18 May 2016, 11:22 am
While these attacks are more complex and rare, they’re harder to detect and thus potentially many times more dangerous. [read post]
18 May 2016, 11:22 am
While these attacks are more complex and rare, they’re harder to detect and thus potentially many times more dangerous. [read post]
18 May 2016, 9:56 am
Conclusion Running a social media competition can be an effective way to generate attention for your brand. [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:08 pm
That recall focused on an enormous number of frozen food brands sold across the United States. [read post]
17 May 2016, 6:00 am
In re Mavety Media, 33 F.3d 1371-72, 31 USPQ2d 1925-26 (Fed. [read post]
16 May 2016, 7:12 am
Headlines like these, suggesting a permanent change probably fueled the negative reaction to the news, but a closer read would reveal that the contemplated “re-brand” would be temporary, only lasting through this year’s Presidential election in November: “Budweiser is Making a Truly Ridiculous Name Change” “Budweiser Has a New Name, and That Name is America” “Anheuser-Busch Renames Budweiser as ‘America'”… [read post]
16 May 2016, 5:01 am
While your law firm may not need an audio logo (although we’re sure that more than a few of you would like that!) [read post]
16 May 2016, 3:04 am
Only in marketing can getting less per roll mean you’re getting more. [read post]
15 May 2016, 1:58 pm
See In re Mr. [read post]
