Search for: "Label v Label"
Results 5881 - 5900
of 13,306
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2014, 5:22 pm
Wendt v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:21 pm
Magnatune makes similar claims: 50% goes straight to musicians, not to lawyers or labels. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 5:39 am
Lexmark Int’l v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
In American Meat v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:04 pm
V. parahaemolyticus naturally inhabits coastal waters in the United States and Canada and is present in higher concentrations during summer. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 12:24 pm
Martin is now the second District of Arizona case to reject Ramirez and adopt the majority reasoning that preemption applies to off-label uses (the other is Scovil v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 9:45 am
Circuit held in Halbig v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
Meat Institute v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
In deciding NAM v SEC the Court noted that Zauderer v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 4:35 am
IPKat readers will recall of the saga of Greek Yogurt Fage UK Ltd & Another v Chobani UK Ltd & Another, a passing off case concerning the use of Hellenic-sounding labelling for yogurt made quite far away from the Pelopponnese [the decision of Briggs J at trial is at [2013] EWHC 630 (Ch), noted by the IPKat here; the appeal decision, at [2014] EWCA Civ 5, featuring Lords Justices Lewison, Kitchin and Longmore, is noted by the IPKat here]. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 10:47 am
Environmentalists are labeled “extremists” undermining Canadian families. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 5:30 am
-> Web Companies Back Vimeo In Fight With Record Labels http://t.co/l3CyVs8hBH -> Milk-crate-gate, or, is there really no such thing as an original idea? [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 8:34 am
The law does not demand good faith from a seller in “those vague commendations of his wares which manifestly are open to difference of opinion,” said Justice Holmes in Deming v. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 8:15 am
Midland Heart Ltd v Idawah [2014] EW Misc B48 (11 July 2014) In this case, a possession order had been made in November 2002 (apparenly an SPO). [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 11:48 am
(Tamar Davis Larsen, et al. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:45 am
Thus, false representations around a firm’s own, or it’s competitor’s, products can be legally actionable, as the Supreme Court again ruled this year in a case about beverage labeling (Pom Wonderful v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:08 am
An interesting lawsuit – Ben Haim et al. v Islamic Republic of Iran et al. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 5:31 am
Enjaian v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 4:28 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued an en banc opinion in the appeal of American Meat Institute v. [read post]
