Search for: "Long v. United States" Results 5881 - 5900 of 20,251
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2018, 4:42 pm by Steve Kalar
  (They'll feel good about themselves while serving their revocation sentences).United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2024, 7:26 pm by ernst
”   In “The Specter of Indian Removal: The Persistence of State Supremacy Arguments in Federal Indian Law,” 123 Columbia Law Review 1533 (2023), Allread takes Oklahoma v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger observes that United States v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:06 am by John Elwood
United States, 12-884, involving state authority in the field of immigration, without comment beyond a one-line notation that “Justice Scalia dissents. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Whenever I teach the federalism portion of my first-year constitutional law course, at least one cynical (but clever) student observes that the juxtaposition between United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 11:35 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Upper Sandusky is the county seat of Wyandot County, Ohio.There are nine Justices on the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:45 am by alysondrake
She took office in January of 2017, becoming the first Latina in the United States Senate. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 9:04 am by admin
On December 22, 2011, the Department of Labor’s Administrative Review Board (ARB) issued a 3-2 en banc decision that limits the application of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) outside of the United States. [read post]
21 May 2018, 4:04 pm by Mike Delikat
Employers across the country started the work week with some positive and long-awaited news. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]