Search for: "Majors v. Majors" Results 5881 - 5900 of 55,563
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2010, 12:42 pm by David S. Cohen
  Those Justices relied on the Slaughter-House Cases, as well as the 1876 case of United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:39 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In Cadder v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43, the Supreme Court held that the Crown’s reliance on admissions made by an accused who had no access to a lawyer while he was being questioned as a detainee at a police station was a violation of his rights under ECHR, arts 6(1), (3)(c). [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:39 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In Cadder v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43, the Supreme Court held that the Crown’s reliance on admissions made by an accused who had no access to a lawyer while he was being questioned as a detainee at a police station was a violation of his rights under ECHR, arts 6(1), (3)(c). [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 6:35 am by Eric Guttag
By holding that Myriad’s claimed cDNA was patent-eligible, Thomas’ opinion reaffirms the major holding in Diamond v. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 1:56 pm
The Court of Appeal take a lengthy and considered comparison of the six reasoned judgments in Kay v Lambeth and settled on the ‘majority’ view as set out by Lord Hope. [read post]