Search for: "People v. Powers"
Results 5881 - 5900
of 15,377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2014, 5:12 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 11:17 am
Janus v. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 7:45 am
Harris v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:19 am
Turn indicators, power steering, or steering knob. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 12:20 pm
The First Amendment, with its powerful protection of speech, even speech that we abhor, and state law, which provides an opportunity to hold accountable people who injure us not just physically but emotionally, as the father of the dead Marine claims here. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 9:48 am
This has to be about bad people doing secretive things in the dead of night to rob earnest and freedom-loving people of their standard-bearer. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 11:00 am
I talk to these people frequently. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:55 am
But some quick Westlaw research kicked up a seemingly relevant case, which --oddly enough--also comes from Utah; namely, Utah Power & Light Co. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2024, 8:36 pm
The brief described the government's "plenary" power over testation, including its ability to abolish altogether people's power to pass down their property. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
Sprigman: Came up in Apple v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:31 am
Duke Power held that it’s fair to presume that in the absence of racism, there would be no disparities. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 4:09 am
It stems from a Supreme Court decision from 1989, DeShaney v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 4:06 am
But this sort of social give-and-take is nothing like the demands for ending people’s professional careers, or attempts to use government power to restrict speech. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 8:56 am
Payne has an intellectual disability and that he meets all of the criteria for intellectual disability under Atkins v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
In those two cases, none of the patent-holders contributed anything to the economic development of the highly profitable products that were created by thousands of other people and the amount of money demanded as damages in those two cases bore no reasonable relationship to the inventor's alleged contribution to those products.The Eolas and Blackberry cases are prime evidence of patent law run wild - a development which has not escaped the notice of the US Supreme Court, whose decision… [read post]
25 Oct 2024, 3:25 pm
The 2012 Fleming v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 12:20 am
[Note - I have now been told it is S.25 of the Greater London Council (General Powers) Act 1973 provides (as amended by s.4 of the Greater London Council (General Powers) Act 1983) and given case reference Hyde Park Residence Ltd v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:18 am
Court of Appeals held in Rivas v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:41 pm
Wisconsin’s case—Wolf v. [read post]
