Search for: "State v. L. B."
Results 5881 - 5900
of 6,572
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2024, 6:50 am
b. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
For example, the US Congress,[2] the European Union[3] and its member states including the UK[4] and Ireland,[5] Australia[6] and others have been re-examining their copyright laws in light of the challenges posed by digital technologies. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
(Pasqua Yaqui Tribe v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
(Pasqua Yaqui Tribe v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: EU Commission adopts proposal to extend copyright protection to performing artists from 50 to 95 years: (IPKat), (Out-Law), (IP Law360), (Patry Copyright Blog), (IPEG), (Techdirt), (Techdirt), ‘Triway’ USPTO, EPO, JPO patent work-sharing pilot starts 28 July: (IP Updates), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (EPO),… [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
§ 102(b). [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm
On the same day HHJ Moloney QC heard a PTR in the case of Ghuman v Ghuman. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 12:39 am
Rives in the case of United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm
US v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 5:46 pm
B. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 2:56 am
In settling EEOC v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
Furthermore, CIL is violated whenever a State, “as a matter of state policy,… practices, encourages or condones (a) genocide, (b) slavery… (c) the murder or causing the disappearance of individuals, (d) torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment… or (g) a consistent pattern of gross violations of internationally recognized human rights. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:53 am
Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 2:55 pm
[L 2014, c 111, pt of §2] So, why would we do it this way? [read post]
21 Oct 2006, 12:15 am
This reasoning seems very close to that of Carl Lüder, a well known German law of armed conflicts expert of this era, who argued for robust military action that was unfettered by concern for international law.Schmitt's ahistorical analysis suggests a dismissive attitude towards basic law of armed conflict rules and a will to be driven by his best assessment of the short-term political interests of his state. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 2:55 pm
[L 2014, c 111, pt of §2] So, why would we do it this way? [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
., that an individual will become ill or die within a stated period of time or by a certain age). [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court stated that for a Court to assess the bona fides of a validity challenge to the arbitration agreement that only a Court can resolve requires: (a) First, the court must determine whether, assuming the facts pleaded to be true, there is a genuine challenge to arbitral jurisdiction. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
The first is the filing of a lawsuit in federal court by the Governor of Missouri against the People's Republic of China, the Chinese Communist Party and other organs (Missouri v, People's Republic of China). [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am
Google LLC v. [read post]
