Search for: "State v. Laws" Results 5881 - 5900 of 156,447
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2022, 5:22 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Rev. 307Tribal Jurisdiction Under The Second Montana Exception: Implications Of United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:25 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: The National Indian Law Library added new content to the Indian Law Bulletins on 2/21/19. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 2:15 am by Steve Brachmann
Supreme Court in Oil States Case appeared first on IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The State’s reduction of its employer contribution for health insurance premiums for judges was an unconstitutional diminution of judicial compensationBransten v State of New York, 2014 NY Slip Op 03214, Appellate Division, First DepartmentSitting and retired members of the New York State Judiciary challenged the State’s recent decrease in its employer contribution to the cost of the judges' health insurance premiums, contending that it… [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 4:56 am by Lawrence Solum
Courts: The Case Against the State Department (Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 51, No. 4, p. 1, 2011) on SSRN. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 12:01 pm
The County filed a declaratory action, seeking confirmation the school was exempt under state law from any special permit requirement. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 8:12 am by Hilf & Hilf, PLC
 The doctrine of preemption is also supported by Michigan Court interpretation of the law (See Michigan Coalition for Responsible Gun Owners v. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 8:55 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
The latest issue of the ICSID Review: Foreign Investment Law Journal (Vol. 39, no. 1, Winter 2024) is out. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 11:01 am
Public employee states First Amendment cause of action Source: Adjunct Law Prof Blog; Reproduced with permission. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 6:30 am
"Michael Krauss at Point of Law deplores the state of preemption jurisprudence generally and suggests that the effect of Levine "may be confined to FDA matters, because of the lack of a pre-emption clause in the statute. [read post]