Search for: "State v. So " Results 5881 - 5900 of 116,389
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2012, 8:58 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Rev. 1867, 1868 (2005), and, doing so, clarify (indeed curtail) the contours of federal power to enact laws that intrude on matters so local that no drafter of the Convention contemplated their inclusion in it. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 12:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
And while that may be so in the federal model, it is not, nor should it necessarily, be the case in the states. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:48 am by Rosalind English
Transpetrol v Slovakia, Application no. 28502/08 - read judgment The facts of this case can be stated very briefly, since the main (and most interesting) question before the Curt was whether the applicant company constituted a “victim” of a human rights violation under the Convention. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 3:31 am
 When the absence of the intention to use the trade mark in accordance with the essential functions of a trade mark concerns only certain goods or services referred to in the application for registration, that application constitutes bad faith only in so far as it relates to those goods or services; EU law does not preclude a provision of national law under which an applicant for registration of a trade mark must state that the trade mark is being used in relation to the… [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Since last Wednesday the legal blogosphere has been busily abuzz about AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 6:46 am by MBettman
Most states don’t even recognize the independent tort of spoliation of evidence. [read post]