Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 5881 - 5900
of 40,650
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2011, 8:14 am
AG v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 8:14 am
AG v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:58 pm
Relying on R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal [2011] UKSC 28, the majority noted that there is a strong interpretative presumption against the exclusion of judicial review, other than by “the most clear and explicit words” (Laws LJ in Cart at the Court of Appeal). [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
Like most Americans, I believe Roe v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:50 am
Yesterday’s second argument was in United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 8:54 am
The style of the case is, Lubbock County Hospital District v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 4:15 pm
The end of Fosler continues apace, with a published en banc opinion from the NMCCA yesterday, in United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
Vidal v. [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 5:25 am
She stated: "Defendant should not be heard now to rely on a presumption that she should have asserted in the divorce court. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
The Court heard arguments in two cases yesterday morning, with United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 9:28 am
In The Patissier LLP v Aalst Chocolate Pte Ltd [2019] SGIPOS 10, the Applicant (The Patissier LLP) sought to revoke the mark(“Subject Mark”) registered in the name Aalst Chocolate Pte Ltd, on the ground of non-use under S 22(1)(a) and (b) of Singapore’s Trade Marks Act (“TMA”). [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:06 pm
Today, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals released Meekins v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court heard argument in Nelson v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 4:16 am
In People v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:07 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Onnen v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 10:08 pm
In Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 1:50 am
So the wording of Judge Peter Beer's motion in the Branch Consultants v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 2:53 pm
Insurers should welcome the Oregon Court of Appeals’ recent decision in Dewsnup v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:21 pm
Recently, in Souza v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 1:34 pm
Suppose, in other words, that the case protects a prima facie right to carry handguns in public. [read post]
