Search for: "State v. Young"
Results 5881 - 5900
of 8,893
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2012, 1:01 pm
In Johnson v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 10:30 am
Department of Justice in the Office of Tribal Justice; v Mary C. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
Of course, there is still that pesky little confusion test for Gucci, which in the Second Circuit is the Polaroid Crop v Polarad Elecs Corp (1961) test (see test here as applied to another famous shoe battle, Louboutin v YSL). [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm
R (on the application of Amada Bizimana) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 414 In the wake of France’s apparently unencumbered expulsion of individuals on public interest grounds there has been a fresh outcry from the press about the shackles imposed by the Human Rights Convention on the UK authorities which other signatory states seem to ignore with impunity. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 5:31 pm
Young). [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:58 pm
” Wired reports on Bowman v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 11:42 am
MAIER v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
The EEOC filed suit (Civil Action No.1:11-c v-00042-SJD) in U.S. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 6:17 am
” In applying he law on “embedded” federal questions, the District Court followed the Supreme Court’s decision in Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:20 am
The Iowa State Patrol said ... [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 2:50 am
To state a cause of action to recover damages for breach of fiduciary duty, a plaintiff must allege: "(1) the existence of a fiduciary relationship, (2) misconduct by the defendant, and (3) damages directly caused by the defendant's misconduct" (Rut v Young Adult Inst., Inc., 74 AD3d 776, 777; see Kurtzman v Bergstol, 40 AD3d 588, 590). [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 10:37 am
I missed the first one, United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:39 am
§1920 – bit.ly/HewRoz (Mark Sidoti) PhotoCop & The Red Light of Admissibility - bit.ly/H18QVF (Josh Gilliland) Pippins v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:12 am
The prevailing claim in Hammer [v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:02 am
See Grutter v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
The man was married and had two young children. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
Boundas v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:53 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:50 am
The transcript of the Day Two argument makes a number of references to Wickard v. [read post]
