Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 5881 - 5900
of 9,108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2013, 5:14 pm
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Simms [2000] AC 115, 126E-G. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 12:09 pm
Supp. 2d 348 (S.D.N.Y. 1998); Bryant v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 7:57 am
Most patents aren't valid as granted (case in point, Apple took down a Samsung 3G SEP the following week). [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 7:30 am
Circuit granted the government’s petition for rehearing en banc in Al-Bahlul v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 11:51 am
(This provision simply codifies the appellate court’s holding in the recent Salmon Protection and Watershed Network v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 8:55 am
THE OFFICE OF CONSUMER ADVOCATE v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 8:31 am
Law: US v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:44 am
The ruling was published yesterday (in Dutch), the same day that a German court gave short shrift to a Nokia v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 5:35 pm
I don’t understand confidence levels. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 7:58 am
Items of clothing might be granted copyright protection if they have reached the stage in which they can be considered art (see Poe v Missing Persons). [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 6:41 pm
Supreme Court in Missouri v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 11:50 am
A writ of certiorari was granted by the Supreme Court, which vacated the Court of Appeal's decision, remanding the case for re-evaluation, in light of Mayo Collaborative Services v Prometheus Laboratories Inc. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 11:30 am
Wells noted the Supreme Court’s decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:05 am
Solicitor General on whether to grant a petition filed by Argentina in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 1:40 pm
Epistemic Crimes In U.S. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 12:40 pm
However, the decision of the Commission allowed collecting societies to maintain their system of bilateral agreements and to keep their right to set levels of royalty payments due within their domestic territory. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 1:56 pm
McKenna: impossible to imagine a system in which the gov’t grants a right and the court gives it no weight at all. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:13 am
Thinking conceptually about reasons for use-based v. registration-based regimes; costs and benefits. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 8:12 am
Now available in redacted form: the government’s opposition brief and the defendant’s reply in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
No one knows for sure what the Supreme Court is going to do with Hollingsworth v. [read post]
