Search for: "Law v. State"
Results 5901 - 5920
of 156,675
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2017, 8:12 am
The doctrine of preemption is also supported by Michigan Court interpretation of the law (See Michigan Coalition for Responsible Gun Owners v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 2:08 pm
In the recent case of Arku-Nyadia v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 8:43 am
Case law agrees that unlawful arrests are actually authorized acts under the statute. [read post]
5 Feb 2022, 6:40 am
YouTube appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 7:35 pm
About 1,316 CR-V vehicles are included in this recall. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 2:32 pm
Cyberlaw Clinic – Harvard Law School – [January 16, 2016], “the Harvard Law School Cyberlaw Clinic, on behalf of a group of esteemed law scholars, filed an amicus brief (pdf) in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 11:01 am
Public employee states First Amendment cause of action Source: Adjunct Law Prof Blog; Reproduced with permission. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 7:49 am
United States (15-1534) Jones v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 12:01 pm
The County filed a declaratory action, seeking confirmation the school was exempt under state law from any special permit requirement. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:05 am
In Hester v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 4:39 pm
Chapter of Univ. of Cal., Hastings College of Law v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 6:43 pm
Supreme Court held in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 6:43 pm
Supreme Court held in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:25 am
Here: The National Indian Law Library added new content to the Indian Law Bulletins on 2/21/19. [read post]
Bond v. United States: SCOTUS Interprets Criminal Statute Narrowly to Preserve Federal-State Balance
3 Jun 2014, 9:23 am
” Stenberg v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:00 am
The State’s reduction of its employer contribution for health insurance premiums for judges was an unconstitutional diminution of judicial compensationBransten v State of New York, 2014 NY Slip Op 03214, Appellate Division, First DepartmentSitting and retired members of the New York State Judiciary challenged the State’s recent decrease in its employer contribution to the cost of the judges' health insurance premiums, contending that it… [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 2:15 am
Supreme Court in Oil States Case appeared first on IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 5:17 pm
In Cloverleaf Realty of New York, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 7:58 am
Section 230 Ripoff Report claimed that removal was justified because Section 230 completely preempted the state law claims. [read post]
