Search for: "Million v State"
Results 5901 - 5920
of 24,661
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2019, 7:16 am
United States (Agricultural Leases) Johnson v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 6:29 am
As the Supreme Court noted in a case cited by Tigar, Rosenberg v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 2:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 12:32 pm
United States (Agricultural Leases) Johnson v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 11:00 am
A”crore” is a unit count of ten million in the Indian numbering system, abbreviated “cr. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Jones v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 7:51 am
The Press Release states: A federal jury today convicted Dr. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 3:49 am
This case (R v Gold & Schifreen (1988) 1 AC 1063) resulted in the Computer Misuse Act 1990. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 3:00 am
There’s a great quote from the 5th Circuit’s 1981 decision in Huddleston v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 11:13 am
The dissent cited Supreme Court Rule 10(a) to highlight that the cases fit easily into a category commonly inviting Supreme Court intervention: a division on a federal question among federal courts of appeals affecting every state and tens of millions of Medicaid recipients. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Irvin v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 7:05 am
See Cascade Health Solutions v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:16 am
She cited the fact that millions of Californians face a monopoly market that lacks any semblance of competition. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 8:07 am
This initiative authorizes a gross receipts tax on the lease of commercial property for landlords with annual gross receipts over $1 million. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
United States. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
Twice, the Supreme Court has stated that it wishes to consider this question.The first occasion was in Marek v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Butts v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 6:26 pm
Supreme Court, EEOC v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 6:26 pm
Supreme Court, EEOC v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 3:34 pm
United States, 324 U.S. 229 (1945) (citation omitted). [read post]