Search for: "State v. Bodi"
Results 5901 - 5920
of 14,866
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm
Malice for the purpose of showing an abuse of the qualified privilege only requires showing of a state of mind arising from hatred or ill will evidencing a willingness “to vex, harass, annoy or injure. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 3:36 am
Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 27, 29 (2005); United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 10:07 am
Maydell, Social Rights and International Law Tafrir Malick Ndiaye, Les droits de l'homme aujourd'hui Ernest Petric, Sovereignty of State v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 7:00 am
Citing Perez v City Univ. of N.Y., 5 NY3d 522, the Appellate Division said that in enacting the State’s Open Meetings Law, “the Legislature sought to ensure that public business be performed in an open and public manner and that the citizens of this state be fully aware of and able to observe the performance of public officials and attend and listen to the deliberations and decisions that go into the making of public policy. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 2:12 pm
This is somewhat ironic, since during the oral arguments for Bilski v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 9:20 am
Alaska Oil & Gas Assn. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 1:20 am
Alaska Oil & Gas Assn. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 7:36 am
Western Sugar Coop. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 4:04 pm
To come back to the IPT, it applies the rulings in the judgement by the European Court of Human Right in Weber & Saravia v Germany [2008] and Kennedy v United Kingdom [2011] to solve issues 2 and 3 (Mention is also made of R E v United Kingdom [2016] and Szabo & Vissy v Hungary). [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:31 am
Justice Hughes concurred in the result only, while Justice Wright filed a separate dissenting opinion (Kentucky Restaurant Association v. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 5:25 am
It was only in 2003 that the United States Supreme Court struck a fatal blow to sodomy laws, in the landmark Lawrence v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:14 pm
(As I would put it: The woman has sovereignty over the interior of her own body and the only legitimate law is her law.)Back to Dr. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 7:00 am
United States, 487 U.S. 201 (1988). [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:45 am
Wolfington Body Co., Inc., October 17, 2016, Pappert, G.). [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 10:59 pm
Enterprises, LLC v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 8:31 pm
A recent federal appellate decision, O’Shea v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 12:02 pm
Wu in the case Casas v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 8:29 am
In the Ninth Circuit, where this warrant was obtained, I can understand why the officers sought out explicit permission: In United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 6:37 am
General Court confirms that body-builder silhouette cannot be registered as a trade mark for nutritional supplementsKatfriend Nedim Malovic updated us on the judgment of Universal Protein Supplements Corp v European Union Intellectual Property Office Case, T-335/15, EU:T:2016:579, concerning an application to register a figurative sign representing a body-builder as a EU trade mark.The proposed press publishers' right: is it really worth all this noise? [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
See Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
