Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 5901 - 5920
of 13,583
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2019, 7:34 am
As stated in ACQIS, LLC v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 10:38 am
See State v. [read post]
25 Jul 2009, 12:32 am
"[C]hose not to call Dr. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:08 am
Guillory & R. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
In Rasul v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:00 am
Guyette, and John R. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
As to the accrual argument, the Court dismissed this argument stating that (1) the claim made by Hensel Phelps was not an action for indemnification that fell within an exception to the statute of limitations, and (2) that the express indemnification provision of the contract was overly broad and sought to indemnify Hensel Phelps from its own negligence in violation of the Uniwest v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 7:25 am
Conduct, 45 AD3d 927, 929 [2007], lv denied 10 NY3d 701 [2008]; Matter of Ostad v New York State Dept. of Health, 40 AD3d at 1253; Matter of Corines v State Bd. for Professional Med. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 8:28 am
In S & R Dev. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 10:06 am
C-42, s. 13; 1997, c. 24, s. 10; 2012, c. 20, s. 7. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 5:08 pm
In A.T. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 7:55 am
By K&L Gates Peskoff v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:36 am
These allegations generally state causes of action sounding in legal malpractice (see Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 26 NY3d at 49; Rules of Professional Conduct [22 NYCRR 1200.0] rule 1.15 [c] [4]), and violation of Judiciary Law § 487 (see Melcher v Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 23 NY3d 10, 14 [2014]; cf. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:38 am
” The Sentencing Law and Policy Blog and PointofLaw report that the Senate Committee on the Judiciary will hold a hearing this morning on how to “[r]estor[e] [k]ey [t]ools to [c]ombat [f]raud and [c]orruption” in light of last Term’s decision in Skilling v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am
See Edwards v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 2:26 am
"In formulating his ruling, Justice Devine noted the decision by the Appellate Division in Civil Service Employees Ass'n v New York State Public Employee Relations Board, 46 AD3d 1037, but concluded that the decision was not a controlling precedent in this case. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 1:15 pm
Baumbast and R v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Case C-413/99) [2002] ECR I-7091 However: Baumbast concerned people who were self-sufficient, without specifically referring to or addressing the fact. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:00 am
Burndred v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm
He concluded that any proceeding in court under subdivision (c) of section 276 of the 1 [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:40 pm
He concluded that any proceeding in court under subdivision (c) of section 276 of the 1939 Internal Reve [read post]
