Search for: "State v. L. A. T."
Results 5901 - 5920
of 9,948
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm
The EEOC Determined in Mia Macy v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
As the present disclaimers have the purpose of restoring novelty over D4b, it is necessary in view of the criteria developed in decision G 1/03 for allowability of disclaimers introduced to restore novelty to determine whether D4b published between the priority date claimed and the filing date represents state of the art pursuant to A 54(3) or a disclosure pursuant to A 54(2). [6] In the context of assessing whether D4b is state of the art pursuant to A 54(3) or A 54(2), the… [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 8:09 pm
sMounting bills Project 365(2) Day 142 (Photo credit: Keith Williamson) V is for Voluntary Disclosure. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:29 pm
Hr’g Tr., Sunlust Pictures, LLC v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 2:16 pm
United States. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 1:48 pm
--The winning attorney: GREGORY L. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 6:24 am
On March 4, 2013, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, in the matter of Foley v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 9:39 am
Prescribed by law: article 26 of the 1881 French Press Law Article 26 of the French Press Law incriminates insulting the head of State, "offense au chef de l'État." [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 10:44 am
L. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
It had the chance—and the potential votes to do so—but it didn’t. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 6:00 am
L/B KAITLYN EYMARD, 12-30378, 2013 WL 886226 (5th Cir. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 8:24 am
AT&T Corp., 550 U.S.437 (2007); see also Brown v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 12:46 pm
The item isn’t approved by the FDA, so the company most likely thought this method was a clever way to advertise the product without having to present any sort of actual evidence as to its claims. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
L. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 7:50 am
U.S. v Windsor isn’t about so much about the individual rights of folks to marry but the rights of states to make rules that are at odds with the federal government. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 5:58 am
[t]he conduct constitutes an offense and is committed either wholly or partly within the state. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 7:22 am
Silvers v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 11:52 am
See Perez v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 3:18 pm
In People v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
