Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 5901 - 5920
of 13,699
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2012, 5:21 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 2:10 pm
In Harlick v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 8:11 pm
State v. [read post]
Federal Texas Court Finds Domainer Texas International Property Associates Liable for Cybersquatting
15 May 2009, 7:33 pm
See Texas International Property Associates v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 11:46 am
The business's lawyer cites a case called People v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 12:46 pm
United States, 439 U.S. 810 (1978); Frakes v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral argument this morning in Golan v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 2:01 pm
However, where a company’s central administration is not in the same place as its registered office, the presence of company assets in a different EU member state could suffice to rebut the Section 3(1) presumption. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
[See the Board's February 2008 decision (TTABlogged here), sustaining Nextel's opposition to Motorola's application to register a 911 Hz chirp on the ground that it failed to function as a trademark.]January 14, 2009 - 10 AM: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
A finding of infringement is a finding that a monopoly granted by the state is to be enforced. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 5:00 am
The SEC’s explanatory comments about the disclosure obligation endorsed restrictions regarding the use of the titles “advisor” and “adviser” and stated it would “presume” that BDs who are not also registered as RIAs violate the disclosure obligation when they refer to themselves or their RRs as “advisors” or “advisers. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 5:11 am
Here is the opinion in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 2:26 am
In Runions v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 3:05 am
” [Alexander v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 7:50 am
gives a keenly-awaited Opinion in Joined Cases C-274/11 and C-295/11 Spain v Council and Italy v Council. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 12:47 pm
Licensing Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
The questions posed to the CJEU relate to trade mark reputation, genuine use and the eligibility for a non-registered trade mark to preclude the registration of a later confusingly similar sign. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 3:08 am
Societe Produits de Nestle S.A. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 4:47 am
Sachs Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 5:17 am
One case currently being litigated, Caner v. [read post]
