Search for: "Strong v. United States"
Results 5901 - 5920
of 6,655
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2006, 10:49 am
United Grain Growers Ltd., [1997] 3 S.C.R. 701 for essentially the same conduct that attracted the punitive damage award. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 9:19 am
This type of intentional misrepresentation is a prevalent form of humor here in the United States, and I hope you have a more positive experience with it in the future. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 6:43 am
In Washington Alliance of Technology Workers v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:13 pm
United States, a case that for the first time declared a right of privacy in the conversation that an individual has in a public telephone booth. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 3:30 pm
United States law determines this by considering: (1) whether the accused infringer actually had access to the original work; and (2) whether the accused infringing work is “substantially similar” to the original work. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 10:36 am
See United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 11:48 pm
Therefore, the research had a built-in bias with a strong stake on the part of the investigators in a desired outcome. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 6:29 am
For example, in United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:30 pm
Earlier: Bingham McCutchen's New 'Merit-Lockstep' Hybrid BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN - Law - Business - Services - United States [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 7:04 am
She catalogs the justice’s occasional victories, like United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 6:46 am
As of the writing of this article in April of 2022, inflation stands at 7.87% percent per year in the United States. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 5:21 am
United States. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 5:18 am
Finally, the court rejected plaintiffs’ claim that defendants are liable because stock market analysts recommended Authentidate’s stock as a “strong buy. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 9:11 am
” United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:47 am
Although it did not come out really plainly in the argument, the Court did seem to sense that there were greater risks to cellphone privacy in the case of a modern smartphone — the kind of device involved in Riley — and a somewhat dated model, the “flip phone,” which is the device at issue in the second case Tuesday, United States v Wurie. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:41 pm
The complaint was filed in the face of many decisions of federal courts in the United States holding that a non-commercial "gripe" site about a trademark holder may use a domain name in the form www.trademark.com so long as the site itself is not confusing about whether it is sponsored by the trademark holder. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 2:10 pm
Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States: Attitudes vs. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 4:09 am
In Estate of Connie Collins v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:07 am
Whatever your feelings about the doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales], it's a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 8:52 am
Groupe SEB USA, Inc. v. [read post]
