Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws"
Results 5901 - 5920
of 55,066
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2022, 5:05 am
Following a hearing, a PERB Administrative Law Judge [ALJ] sustained the charge, determining that Union had engaged in an unlawful strike in violation of Civil Service Law §210(1). [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 5:05 am
Following a hearing, a PERB Administrative Law Judge [ALJ] sustained the charge, determining that Union had engaged in an unlawful strike in violation of Civil Service Law §210(1). [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 4:58 am
In its statement, the I.C.R.C noted that all parties to the conflict have an obligation under international law to give the I.C.R.C access to prisoners of war. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 4:25 am
Hodges and Loving v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 1:31 pm
Vermont v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 10:38 am
If the law requires services to do anything more than this token response, it should be clearly unconstitutional. * Twitter, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
As Locke v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 5:00 am
” The impetus for the campaign was clearly the recent decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 3:26 pm
In People v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 6:21 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in the Obergefell v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 3:33 pm
In 2021, over 80,000 people died from opioid overdoses. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 2:20 pm
Some people, however, have objected to a different provision of the laws: that contractors certify that they aren't boycotting Israeli companies through such refusals to deal. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 2:00 pm
Whenever I tell people I am a divorce lawyer they say, “You must have a lot of stories. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
If parents have a right to send their children to private schools, as Pierce v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 5:48 am
See Buckley Towers Condo., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 5:00 am
Here is the column: With the Supreme Court’s overturn of Roe v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:42 am
The office of Inspector General Joseph V. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
The trial tested a rarely used criminal statute meant to ensure that people comply with congressional subpoenas. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
EDITOR’S CHOICE In an essay in The Regulatory Review, Katie Eyer, professor at Rutgers Law School, urged supporters of LGBTQ equality to look beyond the ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 1:02 pm
The courts will decide whether cases like Daily Mail v Google and Texas et al. v Google show illegal monopolization of data flows, so as to fall within this special case of market power. [read post]
