Search for: "United States v. California" Results 5901 - 5920 of 13,838
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2016, 4:31 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The majority held in the Dred Scott case that a slave was not a citizen of the United States and therefore did not have the requisite status to be a part of a suit in federal court. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 1:51 pm by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state courts in North Carolina, in the United States Federal Court for the Western District of North Carolina, in the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and in the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 1:04 pm by Lawrence Taylor
 The guidelines are typified by those named by the California Supreme Court in Ingersoll v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm by Tim Paone
  In Rapanos v United States, the Court rejected what it considered overly broad interpretations of that phrase, noting that under some of the views presented, “waters of the United States” could “engulf entire cities and immense arid wastelands. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm by Tim Paone
  In Rapanos v United States, the Court rejected what it considered overly broad interpretations of that phrase, noting that under some of the views presented, “waters of the United States” could “engulf entire cities and immense arid wastelands. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 2:03 pm by Tamar N. Dolcourt
For example, Justice Elena Kagan had to recuse herself from certain cases that she participated in as Solicitor General to the United States before she was appointed to the Court. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:43 pm by Steven M. Taber
The Noise Control Act contains the finding that “The Congress declares that it is the policy of the United States to promote an environment for all Americans free from noise that jeopardizes their health or welfare. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 8:16 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Finally, Justice Scalia wrote the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am by John Ehrett
Lane; and (2) whether the United States Supreme Court has jurisdiction over a state court determination of retroactivity of a case on collateral review, when a state has both adopted and applied Teague. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 10:27 am by Andrew Hamm
” At Notice & Comment, David Rubenstein argues that United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 9:30 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  As the Supreme Court stated in United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:54 am by admin
” Do not sign anything without first talking to a lawyer as you will likely be presented with an Order for Voluntary Departure. [1] United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 5:50 am by Doug Cornelius
United States Supreme Court of the United States Building, Washington, DC, as seen from the west side of 1st St NE. by 350z33 CC BY SA [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 11:22 am by Ackerman Law Office
There is a new case that was making its way up to the United States Supreme Court called Friedrichs vs the California teachers Association. [read post]