Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 5921 - 5940 of 9,057
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2011, 6:16 am by Juggalo Law
[Entertainment Weekly]Lindsay Lohan* More than 100 law professors are lobbying Congress to apply an ethics code to the Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 6:30 am by Jim Sedor
Paul Pioneer Press Elections “Why Ohio’s Bribery Law Isn’t Going to Upend the GOP Race” by Philip Elliott for Time Legislative Issues “Court Rules Indiana Lawmakers Can Keep Emails Private” by Tom Davies (Associated Press) for Indianapolis Business Journal Redistricting “Supreme Court Upholds Arizona Redistricting Plan” by Robert Barnes for Washington Post [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:39 am by Ted Frank
Winn] Judge Laurence Silberman speaks out on the mainstream media double standard on Supreme Court ethics. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:15 am by Chris Walsh
However, there are exceptions to this rule, which can be found in other Supreme Court rulings, such as Florida v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:00 pm by azatty
Supreme Court—by Arizona lawyers who have done it. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 5:14 pm
"   The post from Lyle Denniston  at SCOTUSblog reports on yesterday's Supreme Court argument in which the state of Arizona and the federal government argued  for â€â [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 9:34 pm
The United States Supreme Court reasoned that if someone were not aware of his rights, then having those rights would not be of any use to them. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:07 am by Renee Newman Knake
" On the US Supreme Court and female lawyers:  "While the high court now has three women on its nine-member bench — the most ever — the justices are still more than five times more likely to hear an argument from a male attorney than from a woman, an Associated Press review shows. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:12 am by Rachel Sachs
Over at Slate, Emily Bazelon considers lessons to be learned from this past Term and the Affordable Care Act cases in particular regarding Supreme Court oral arguments. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm
Supreme Court during prohibition in 1925 sanctioned warrantless searches of vehicles. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 7:11 am by John H Curley
According to the Court, the Supreme Court's decision in 14 Penn Plaza v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 11:51 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Repeated reversals of this rogue court by the Supreme Court are not having the needed effect. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 7:20 am by Rory Little
In Justice Scalia’s earliest criminal law decision for the Court, Arizona v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
Arizona, a challenge to Arizona’s death-penalty scheme and the death penalty nationwide, is because “the Court has already decided to turn the case down, and Justice Breyer is penning yet another magnum opus of a dissent. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:30 am by Rick Hasen
  Decisions like these (and a health care reversal, if that comes), makes it more likely for Obama to make an issue of the Supreme Court, as I suggested in Scalia’s Retirement Party. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 11:03 am by randal shaheen
” The Snapple case bears similarities to a case now pending before the California Supreme Court that we have previously blogged on here. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 1:44 pm by Kevin Goldberg
 In my mind, it’s dead-on certain that the Supreme Court would agree to resolve the split in Circuit law, should such a split develop. [read post]