Search for: "Beare v. State" Results 5921 - 5940 of 15,039
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2016, 7:46 pm
Resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council 26/9 Elaboration of an international legally binding instrument on transnational corporations and other business enterprises with respect to human rights The Human Rights Council,Recalling the principles and purposes of the Charter of the United Nations, Recalling also the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Recalling… [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
More recently, we have received the Opinion of the Advocate General (AG) of the CJEU (in Tele2 Sverige AB v Post- och telestyrelsen and Secretary of State for the Home Department v Tom Watson and Others, Joined Cases C-203/15 and C-698/15, 19 July 2016). [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 6:41 pm by David M. Boertje
It states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
 In Department of Finance v Commission on State Mandates,* the Court ruled in favor of public agencies subject to storm water discharge permits, holding that State-mandated storm water permit provisions exceeding federal law requirements may be reimbursable State mandates under Article XIII B, Section 6, of the California Constitution. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 2:02 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Guidance clearly states that the EEOC views participating in any capacity in a complaint process or other protected equal employment opportunity as protected activity which is protected from retaliation under all circumstances. [read post]
27 Aug 2016, 4:41 am by SHG
Unless a legislature decides to title a law the “Retroactive Punishment of Child Molesters Statute,” the Supreme Court of the United State has held in Smith v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 7:26 pm by John A. Gallagher
Cmwlth. 2000) (holding that claimant who quit to return to another state to care for his emotionally disturbed child was eligible for benefits); Miksic v. [read post]