Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 5921 - 5940 of 12,894
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2015, 5:20 am by Jon Hyman
Most employers do either “a” or “b”, while very few opt for “c”. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 4:53 am by chief
Five of the six in Building A and seven of the nine in Building B were members of the company. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 10:50 am by Sutherland LNG
  The PNWLNG terminal is majority sponsored by Malaysian state oil company Petronas. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 2:30 pm by Alexander Major
The primary purposes of having an attorney involved in any investigation is to ensure (a) external review and (b) the protection of findings under the attorney-client privilege. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 1:04 pm by Hunton & Williams LLP
The evidence did not show that the communications: (a) involved any confidential communications between attorney and client; (b) contained requests for, or discussion necessary to obtain legal advice; or (c) included the provision of legal advice. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
§ 104 (a) (1); and The payments are also those as described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of Internal Revenue Code Section 130(c) (2), or 26 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 11:02 pm by Pietro Franzina
The request for a preliminary ruling arose from a dispute involving a German national resident in Germany, Mr Spies von Büllesheim, who had entered a Dutch company’s service as a managing director, in addition to being a shareholder of that company. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 12:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
”  “Squaw Bread”—said they didn’t mean to offend b/c it was just called “squaw bread”/they wanted to give credit to Native American origin. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Himmelreich 15-109Issue: Whether a final judgment in an action brought under Section 1346(b) dismissing the claim on the ground that relief is precluded by one of the Federal Tort Claims Act’s exceptions to liability, 28 U.S.C. 2680, bars a subsequent action by the claimant against the federal employees whose acts gave rise to the FTCA claim. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 1:05 pm by Caesar and Napoli, P.C.
McKinley Jr., James C, “2 Companies Accused of Faking Safety Checks at Building Sites,” The New York Times, 2 July 2014. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 11:08 am
In the second part of her presentation, Elena covered EU cases concerning various types of non-traditional marks including olfactory (Sieckmann C-273/00), 3D (Philips C-299/99 and Lego C-48/09), sound (Shield Mark C-283/01) and colour marks (Libertel C-104/01 and Heidelberger C-49/02). [read post]