Search for: "Does 1 - 23"
Results 5921 - 5940
of 15,479
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2021, 6:36 am
Affiliates (Nov. 23, 2010), https://www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/fin-2010-g006.pdf. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 1:27 pm
” The full OCR guidance can be found on the HHS’s website, which also includes recommendations for protection of data in order to prevent a breach, as well as response and recovery from the ransomware attack.[11] It should be noted that this new guidance does not create new law. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 8:03 pm
”[1] However the arguments put forth by the critics, in their defense of the outmoded positivist notion of the absolute power of national sovereignty, threaten to undermine the precedential foundation of the very doctrine which makes such a “safe harbor” impossible. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 6:36 am
Affiliates (Nov. 23, 2010), https://www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/fin-2010-g006.pdf. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 7:29 am
(b) Scope of section. -- This section does not apply if a person is sentenced to death. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 12:02 pm
” J.A. 7031 at 19:15–20:23; see alsoJ.A. 18–19. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
”[1] The sharing economy delivers products, places, rides and various other perks to consumers through the use of modern technology. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:24 am
However, it took a long time for the Philippines to ratify the covenant, doing so only on January 23, 1987. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 10:24 am
Circuit's June 23 decision, which held that (1) the Court of Appeals does have mandamus jurisdiction over the CMCR (and, through it, the military commissions); but (2) Nashiri had not surmounted the high bar for mandamus relief because (a) he likely has other remedies; and (b) his claims on the merits, though significant, raise questions of first impression--and are thus beyond the appropriate scope of mandamus. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:42 pm
Yesterday (January 23, 2019), the EPO's Opposition Division scheduled a hearing in those two parallel proceedings for November 28, 2019, and tue summons to the hearing came with an annex: a preliminary opinion according to which those patents are invalid.Here's one of the two near-identical opinions, and here's a link to the other (this post continues below the document with an explanation of the EPO's findings and a summary of Qualcomm's poor results in… [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 11:58 am
The questions ‘1. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 2:09 pm
"If geolocation is inserted in Article L.34-1-1, it is confined to anti-terrorist purposes, even though the intelligence services might need it for much broader purposes," explained Senator Sueur. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 1:05 am
(pp. 15-17)The Act does not define “social or recreational activity. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 2:09 pm
"If geolocation is inserted in Article L.34-1-1, it is confined to anti-terrorist purposes, even though the intelligence services might need it for much broader purposes," explained Senator Sueur. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 2:09 pm
"If geolocation is inserted in Article L.34-1-1, it is confined to anti-terrorist purposes, even though the intelligence services might need it for much broader purposes," explained Senator Sueur. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 2:09 pm
"If geolocation is inserted in Article L.34-1-1, it is confined to anti-terrorist purposes, even though the intelligence services might need it for much broader purposes," explained Senator Sueur. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 6:30 am
In contrast to the President, the military enjoys very high confidence numbers from the public on its ability to protect national security as a general matter—significantly higher than does any other institution we have asked about. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 11:00 am
This Article thus does not refer to the absence of a procedure but only to the absence of procedural provisions. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
In sum, no matter how bad a job the Grouper does, it can hardly do worse than the current procedure. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:55 pm
But the Panel opinion at issue here does not merely conflict with out-of-state authority in a very similar case. [read post]
