Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption" Results 5921 - 5940 of 22,051
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2015, 6:21 am by Joy Waltemath
While Boeing argued that she was not cleared to return to work in time for the position, the court explained that because it had already ruled that fact questions existed as to the unpaid leave claim, it would not rule as a matter of law that the alleged discrimination of the unpaid leave alone equaled discrimination in withdrawing a job offer due to that leave. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:09 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
In so ruling, the Court rejected the basis of the Ninth Circuit’s contrary ruling, which had found the arbitration agreement at issue to be ambiguous and, applying California state contract law that contractual ambiguities should be construed against the drafter, held that the agreement allowed for class arbitration. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 1:10 pm by Victoria Hordern
For instance, in the past, Spain, Hungary and Italy have adopted stricter approaches to the availability of legitimate interests. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 6:47 am
(The theory was, yes, this could increase emissions at individual power plants, but that it wouldn't matter if aggregate power plant emissions dropped over time. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
(Op. by Olson, J.), that a trial court judge must reconsider her refusal to stay a civil lawsuit while a companion criminal case is pending.The lawsuit in this matter was brought by a nonunion electrical contractor against an indicted union boss and other defendants.With its ruling the Pennsylvania Superior Court adopted the six-factor test established by the federal courts for determining whether to stay a civil case pending resolution of a related criminal… [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 6:21 am by David Oxenford
The dismissal occurred before the FCC’s new translator interference rules were adopted, and this week’s decision rejected arguments that the dismissal request should have been put on hold until those rules were adopted and took effect. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 2:16 pm
The Court of Appeals sustained the Commission's first three exceptions but overruled it onthe matter of Rule 8.4(d), noting that the Commission's reliance on the existence of contradictory testimony at the fact hearing was not a proper basis for a valid exception to the hearing judge's finding on that point.The Court of Appeals noted the breadth of Rule violations in this case and the failure of Respondent to take the opportunity that the Commission afforded… [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 12:07 pm by Peter Tannenwald
  The rules as initially adopted were somewhat restrictive in a number of important respects. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 3:36 am by Lyle Denniston
Adopting [Anthony] Elonis’ view would make threats one of the most protected categories of unprotected speech, thereby sowing tension throughout our First Amendment doctrine. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 2:48 pm by Bernard Vogel, III
  Readers are encouraged to review publications on this matter at www.svlg.com. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
Both of these two possibilities build on the stare decisis question presented in Dobbs: When is it legitimate for individual Justices (or the Court as a whole) to continue to follow an earlier ruling that they believe to be wrong as a matter of constitutional first principle? [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:08 pm by Bartolus
The Court of Justice held that the national court may not stay the recovery proceedings in such circumstances but must rule on the matter without waiting for a Commission decision. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 8:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
… [R]eferring the matter to the FDA would do little more than protract matters. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 10:24 am by Jeremy Malcolm
The essence of this paragraph is that it requires large user-generated content platforms to reach agreements with copyright holders to adopt automated technologies that would scan content that users upload, and either block that content or pay royalties for it. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 6:57 am
ECUSA, the court ruled, had not taken an appeal from Judge Ortbal's denial of the motion to substitute, and so it had no appellate jurisdiction to rule on the matter now.This aspect of the decision probably diminishes significantly the chance that any further or higher appeals will go anywhere. [read post]