Search for: "P. T.2" Results 5921 - 5940 of 14,919
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2016, 3:59 am
 Three weeks ago, the CJEU issued its decision in Shoe Branding Europe BVBA v Adidas and OHIM[CaseC‑396/15 P]. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 1:50 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
The case was based on Art. 7(2) of the German Design Act in force prior to implementation of Design Directive 98/71/EC (Art. 7(2), too, prohibited registration of designs that are contrary to public order and accepted principles of morality). [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 2:57 pm
The result (presuming that the C.J. and Kittredge are still at odds) would be a 2-2 tie, with the result that the writ could not issue.Long and short of it: The Court will issue the petition restraining Judge Dickson only if the two new appointees both vote with the Chief Justice to grant the writ. [read post]
27 May 2021, 8:00 am by Scarlet Kim
Circuit granted the Justice Department’s fifth request for an extension on its opening brief, which is now due July 2. [read post]
2 May 2022, 10:12 am by Katherine Pompilio
Ullman, chairman of the Killowen Group; and Leslie T. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:20 pm by David M. McLain
§ 38-33.3-302(2), the Court of Appeals held that the declarant consent provision does not violate that section because the Association has no power to amend the declaration itself. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:20 pm by David M. McLain
§ 38-33.3-302(2), the Court of Appeals held that the declarant consent provision does not violate that section because the Association has no power to amend the declaration itself. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 12:59 pm
Giving the rich tax cuts will not, therefore, stimulate the economy.(2) "He also said that poor people have so much credit card debt anything extra they get just gets plowed into debt payments and doesn't really stimulate any new purchases. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) 2. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm by Howard Knopf
 York University, 2017 FC 669 (CanLII), [2018] 2 FCR 43, <https://canlii.ca/t/h4s07>  During that proceeding, York focussed only on whether the “interim” tariff was mandatory and suggested for some reason that the CBC v. [read post]