Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 5921 - 5940 of 15,316
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2017, 12:08 pm by Daniel Nazer
The ’532 patent issued in June 2013, about a year before the Supreme Court’s decision in Alice v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 11:30 am by EEM
"Hybrid Open Access [info]"Life in De Facto Statelessness in Enclaves in India and Bangladesh," Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, vol. 38, no. 1 (Jan. 2017)"The Sea as Humanitarian Space: Non-governmental Search and Rescue Dilemmas on the Central Mediterranean Migratory Route," Mediterranean Politics, Latest Articles, 16 March 2017Law Review Articles"A-R-C-G- is not the Solution for Domestic Violence Victims," Catholic University Law Review, vol.… [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:24 am by Nelson Tebbe
On Monday, a Fifth Circuitpanel will hear Barber v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 4:18 am by Jim Singer
A recent Federal Circuit decision illustrates the high eligibility hurdles that fintech software patents continue to face in view of the Supreme Court’s 2014 Alice v CLS Bank decision. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 4:32 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As I have frequently noted (most recently here), Brazil’s ever-expanding corruption investigation that initially focused on Petrobras, the country’s state-run oil company, has swept up an increasing number of companies across the country’s economy (and elsewhere in Latin America as well). [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 8:11 am by Roel van Woudenberg
(c) The communication furthermore announced that, should the applicant ask for a decision on the state of the file without filing further requests, amendments or comments, the application would then be refused "based on the above arguments taken in combination with the arguments provided in the summons" (see communication B, point 3).V. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
A complaint filed by the Equal  Employment Opportunity Commission to comply with the requirements of 42 USC 2000e-5(c)and 42 USC 12117(a) and29 USC 633(b) does not constitute the filing of a complaint within the meaning of §297(9) of New York State's Executive Law.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2017/2017_01910.htm [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 10:18 pm
These Conferences brought together large numbers of Chicano youth from throughout the United States and provided them with opportunities to express their views on self-determination. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
It is well established that the exemption applies both before and after publication (see Campbell v MGN [2003] QB 633). [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
These Conferences brought together large numbers of Chicano youth from throughout the United States and provided them with opportunities to express their views on self-determination. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:03 am by Jelle Hoekstra
Document D1 was therefore comprised in the state of the art according to Article 54(3) EPC.The opposition division further held that claim 1 of the first and second auxiliary requests filed during the oral proceedings before the opposition division on 7 December 2010 did not contain subject-matter which extended beyond the content of the application as filed (Article 100(c) EPC in combination with Article 123(2) EPC), but that the subject-matter of said claims did not involve an… [read post]