Search for: "W. D."
Results 5921 - 5940
of 13,760
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2018, 4:11 pm
., dissenting), rev’d by 665 F.3d 1037 (9th Cir. 2011) (en banc). [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 10:10 am
There needs to be more upfront planning - 99% of mistakes happen because w'ere not asking the right questions. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:58 am
In February I wrote that "[w]e m[ight] very well see one or more mandamus petitions in this context" because "these defendants won't leave a stone unturned in their attempts to move the matter out of Texas. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:04 am
SPV Coach Company, Inc., Opposition No. 91212312 (June 21, 2017) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Hightower).Under Section 45 of the Trademark Act, a mark is deemed to be abandoned “[w]hen its use has been discontinued with intent not to resume use. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 12:30 am
Olmsted and Paul W. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 2:10 pm
Author: Thurman W. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 7:13 am
“He is always removed and participating at the same time, self-conscious and without the visceral need or love of transactional politics that would characterize Bill Clinton or L.B.J. or even W., in a way. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 11:34 pm
I must say, I never thought I'd see the day when out-of-control murder was the dominant news story in Portland. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 2:42 am
Serial No. 87860519 (October 14, 2020) [ not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 4:07 pm
Yvonne W. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 7:30 am
“In reality … [w]hat happens is that a purchaser is less likely to perceive differences from a famous mark. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:51 am
The dismissal was with prejudice for everything but the contributory false advertising claim, but the court cautioned that DFA shouldn’t try again without keeping Rule 11 in mind, since there’d already been amended complaints and extensive discovery.Because of a past dispute on pricing, DFA stopped carrying ELC products and ELC refused to deal with DFA when DFA changed its mind. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 3:15 am
In re Brats Berlin, Inc., Serial No. 87055289 (December 1, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 8:54 am
W. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 12:15 pm
” They were instructed to keep the entire engagement secret, and “[w]e were not even allowed to speak with our supervisor about what was going on. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 11:00 pm
Dinwoodie and Mark D. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 7:15 am
See Aristophanes, The Clouds (W. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 3:28 am
In re Elisabeth Stecki DBA Whineware, Serial No. 87215481 (January 24, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 10:41 am
., L’Oréal USA S/D, Inc., and Redken 5th Avenue NYC, L.L.C. [read post]
