Search for: "B. R." Results 5941 - 5960 of 55,765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2020, 3:16 pm by Anthony Zaller
., tit. 8, § 11070, subd. 4(B)), defined as “the time during which an employee is subject to the control of an employer, and includes all the time the employee is suffered or permitted to work, whether or not required to do so” (id., § 11070, subd. 2(G)). [read post]
., Nov. 26, 2019), the Northern District of California certified an injunctive relief class under Rule 23(b)(2) but declined to certify a damages class. [read post]
., Nov. 26, 2019), the Northern District of California certified an injunctive relief class under Rule 23(b)(2) but declined to certify a damages class. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 9:04 am by David Post
(b)No person convicted of murder or a felony sexual offense shall be qualified to vote until restoration of civil rights. [read post]
(ii) Agreement on key conventions for compounding risk-free rate, in particular: (A) whether to compound the rate (whereby the interest amount is calculated daily by compounding the daily published RFR and applying the compounded rate to the principal) or compound the balance (whereby the interest is calculated daily on the outstanding principal plus accumulated unpaid interest balance); and (B) the use or not of an observation shift, which impacts the weighting of days in the reference… [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 2:00 am by Christopher Tyner
Kerik and former Wall Street financier Michael R. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 10:01 pm by Tom O'Connor
  Tom has also written several terrific informational overview series for CloudNine, including his most recent one, DOS and DON’TS of a 30(b)(6) Witness Deposition. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 1:57 pm by Will Troutman (US)
Section 6(b) frustration: He expressed his continued displeasure with Section 6(b) of the Consumer Product Safety Act, which sets forth a procedure CPSC must follow before releasing product/manufacturer-specific information to the public. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 1:49 pm by Michael Froomkin
The panel was Judge R. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 12:43 pm by Mark Ashton
 The assertions were that: (a) the individual defendant was not a “person” within the meaning of Section 1983; (b) the notice to the plaintiffs was adequate and did not interfere with their due process rights; and, (c) the claims had been litigated in state court and were barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 10:53 am by Paul J. Feldman and Davina Sashkin
Political Public File 101: the Communications Act and the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA) require that all broadcast stations put in their public inspection file a record of any and all requests to purchase advertising time a) by or on behalf of a legally qualified candidate for public office; OR b) that communicates a message relating to any political matter of national importance. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 10:01 pm by Tom O'Connor
  Tom has also written several terrific informational overview series for CloudNine, including his most recent one, DOS and DON’TS of a 30(b)(6) Witness Deposition. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 3:45 pm by Patricia Hughes
In determining whether technology is reasonably available, consideration should be given to factors including: (a) The lawyer’s or law firm’s practice areas; (b) The geographic locations of the lawyer’s or firm’s practice; and (c) The requirements of clients. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 2:24 pm by Eugene Volokh
Note that this is the defendants' view of the matter, and, like plaintiff's allegations, has not been proved: Over the course of the Fall 2016 semester, Defendants received (1) complaints from students about Plaintiff's class and (2) a complaint from a student regarding an inappropriate and uncomfortable interaction during which Plaintiff (a) asked about the student's dating relationships; (b) asked whether she had any tattoos; (c) invited her to watch a movie with him;… [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 8:20 am by Tyler Broker
The Justice many suggested would take on the bureaucratic state, keeps getting outraged lately at the concept of judicial review over bureaucrats. [read post]