Search for: "Brown v. Brown" Results 5941 - 5960 of 12,771
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2012, 2:35 pm by lawshucks
Vris has been at Vinson & Elkins four-and-a-half years, ever since the boutique she cofounded was acquired by V&E. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 12:46 am by John Diekman
Brown-Serulovic, NY Slip Op 05381 (2d Dept. 2012).Here is the decision.Monday’s issue: Newly-discovered evidence. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
“Someone could have put their hand in the window and unlocked the door and taken the kids” [Lenore Skenazy/Free Range Kids; related stories here and here; similar, Illinois Policy] Police warn that plan in Scotland to provide state guardian for every child could backfire in abuse investigations [Telegraph, more on “named person” scheme] Also from Scotland: Law Society says proposed ban on liquor promotion is so broad it might snag parent wearing rugby-sponsor jacket at… [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 12:47 pm
Today the Court of Appeal decides the fate of $331 million held by the State of California. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 1:10 pm
Here's a dramatic story about the career of the late Professor Bill Murphy, via Eric Muller.... [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 4:50 pm
The election is over but the IP case lives on.... [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The rule became effective on March 4, 2002 (see 22 NYCRR 1215.1 [a]; Brown Rudnick Berlack Israels LLP v Zelmanovitch, 11 Misc 3d 1090[A] [2006]), approximately seven weeks before Ganea retained Rubenstein for the guardianship matter underlying this appeal. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 2:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The rule became effective on March 4, 2002 (see 22 NYCRR 1215.1 [a]; Brown Rudnick Berlack Israels LLP v Zelmanovitch, 11 Misc 3d 1090[A] [2006]), approximately seven weeks before Ganea retained Rubenstein for the guardianship matter underlying this appeal. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 7:10 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on the Court’s decision in Luna Torres v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:01 am by Administrator
Abella and Brown JJ. are of the view that the documents sought by the defence do not meet the threshold of “likely relevance” within the meaning of R. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Perhaps it reflects the tax fraud defense offered in Browning v. [read post]