Search for: "DOE 5" Results 5941 - 5960 of 84,762
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2009, 12:59 pm by Michael W. Huseman
"So, the Act addresses late notices, but it does not address a complete failure to provide the notice. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 6:45 pm by MEL
Please note that this article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 7:05 am by Holly Filius
In these cases, the bad-mouthing leads the child to further bond with the other parent because the child can no longer trust or believe what the bad-mouthing parent says or does. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 4:35 am
For more information, see How to fix your marraige: 5 tips to stop divorce in its tracks. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:10 pm by Morgan Kennedy
  AT&T’s motion argues that the FTC is wrong to assume that Section 5 does not prohibit the agency from regulating the non-common carrier activities of common carriers, because Section 5 defines the FTC’s jurisdiction in terms of specific entities (namely, “persons, partnerships, or corporations”) and thus the exemption turns on “the status of the regulated entity, not the particular activity in which it is engaged. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 8:37 am by Bill Marler
  The number of ill persons identified in each state is as follows: Alabama (13), Arkansas (5), California (2), Florida (1), Georgia (4), Illinois (24), Indiana (22), Iowa (8), Kentucky (63), Massachusetts (2), Michigan (6), Minnesota (5), Mississippi (5), Missouri (13), New Jersey (2), North Carolina (5), Ohio (5), Pennsylvania (2), South Carolina (3), Tennessee (8), Texas (2), and Wisconsin (4). [read post]
9 May 2013, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
However, because the complaint did not state that each of the 200 alleged class members was owed at least $25,000 (200 x $25,000 = $5 million), it did not allege that the amount in controversy was at least $5 million, and "it fell short of triggering the removal clock under Section 1446(b)." [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 7:47 pm by Sme
Alerus Financial, N.A. (10th Cir., June 5, 2017) (affirming summary judgment for Alerus: it is the duty of the plaintiff asserting a breach of fiduciary duty claim under ERISA to prove losses to the plan)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 12:27 pm by Derek T. Muller
The ABA does not distinguish between the two, or distinguish in the amount. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Judge Oldham, joined in whole or part by 5 other judges, also filed a dissenting opinion, saying in part:The panel held RLUIPA does not allow prisoners to sue state prison officials in their individual capacities for money damages. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:51 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
One might infer that a high vaccination percentage does not correlate with a below average number of new cases. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 4:29 am
Secondly, you may have a Premises Licence, but does it allow all the licensable activities you want to carry out? [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 4:59 am
Does your employer: (1) set your schedule; (2) employer supervise your work; (3) threaten to terminate or punish you if you do not "accept" work for the day; (4) provide the tools to perform the job; or (5) essentially treat you like an employee? [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 11:45 am by Jon Sands
When does free speech become harassment? [read post]