Search for: "DOES I-X" Results 5941 - 5960 of 7,403
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2010, 11:24 am
So how does all of this figure in to communicating 401(k) plans? [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 2:21 pm by Jodi B. Ginsberg
The key difference between the two types is that Type I does not typically result in nerve lesions whereas Type II displays significant nerve damage. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 8:43 am
  I have worked with Richard on panels and have heard him speak many times. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 8:04 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
So I hope that if Washington ever decides to actually listen to the cries of the poor, it does so with both ears and heart.And with the brain? [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 3:59 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Given the large number of patents in the video space, it may not actually be possible to build an open source codec that does not inadvertently infringe on someone’s patent. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:28 pm
 Justice Scalia thinks that when Doe says "X" he means whatever his audience will reasonably understand "X" to mean, regardless of Doe's subjective intent, whereas Stanley Fish thinks that when Doe says "X" he means whatever Doe intends, regardless of what his audience will (reasonably or otherwise) understand. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 6:10 am
” The Court found SEC Regulations S-X and S-K confirmed this interpretation, as those regulations, read together, distinguished between financial and non-financial statement portions of filings. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:18 pm by Jeffrey Richardson
  My focus here is on what I expect lawyers to love the most.Retina DisplayPrevious iPhones had an impressive 480 x 320 screen. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:34 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
Well, this is what you get to keep in a bankruptcy case in Arizona, along with stuff that's worthless and stuff that's over-encumbered.For those of you who have trouble sleeping, or who are obsessive-compulsive, I'm going to close today by showing you the text of 11 USC 522, just so you get to understand the agony I got to experience (misery loves company) when I was learning this stuff thirty years ago, under the expert supervision of two, count them, TWO,… [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 7:26 am by Adam Thierer
The fact that x and y happened at more or less the same time does not in itself mean that x must have caused y, or indeed vice-versa. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 3:04 pm
The principle of accession bestows ownership of P (an unowned resource) on x as a function of x’s ownership of Q, Q being the property most prominently connected/related to P. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 12:31 am by Lawrence Solum
  For example, we might use a temporal baseline to define harm: action X is a harm to individual P if and only if P is worse off after X and this change in welfare is causally produced by X. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:23 pm
When I do receive any answer of purported substance, it usually comes in the form of "the defendant has been observed hanging out on X Street... [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 8:55 am by Gerard Magliocca
 Does the Tenth Amendment protect a state’s right to default? [read post]