Search for: "Good v. Good" Results 5941 - 5960 of 76,266
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
A politics of amendment can and will be used by both parties—and all too the good! [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 11:46 am
Just because a deal is a good one for one client doesn't mean it's good for the class or fair, adequate and reasonable overall, nor does that mean there's a per se conflict. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But good progressives would almost certainly agree that John Q. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court articulated the modern extraterritoriality test in two alcohol price-affirmation cases in the 1980s.[14] Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Marc DeGirolami
Or consider the doctrine of state sovereign immunity, which the Court said in Alden v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 2:36 am by Cristina Mariottini
Mariottini, Senior Research Fellow at the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for Procedural Law: Henry Deeb GABRIEL, Contracts for the Sale of Goods – A Comparison of U.S. and International Law, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2022, pp. v-401. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 9:05 pm by John Armour
” Against a backdrop of lackadaisical climate policy, that sounds like a rare piece of good news for climate campaigners. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 3:47 pm
 More the pity.Not because this is necessarily bad, but precisely because it has been either so badly articulated as to be useless or so cluelessly adopted (usually from an ignorant reading of quite stylishly alluring secondary sources) in an effort to be avant garde, that more harm than good results. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 9:25 am by Eric Goldman
They have good reason to think 230 might apply to apps in their app store, considering that courts have reached that conclusion in Ginsburg v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:56 am by Samuel Bray
Equity's concern with the protection of information can be seen as far back as 1818 and the canonical case of Gee v. [read post]