Search for: "High v State"
Results 5941 - 5960
of 35,518
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2015, 9:22 am
Guy, et al. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 8:59 am
(Id. at 14-15) (citing United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 8:04 am
When the high court granted review in Schriro v. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 1:13 pm
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
The court remitted to the High Court the question whether Mr Lumba was detained for longer than a reasonable period in breach of the Hardial Singh principles. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 5:21 am
" Professor Mortenson asserted that the couple was properly married following Judge Friedman's ruling and that status cannot be undone, even if the SCOTUS reinstates Michigan's constitutional ban on gay marriage.Ever since the 5-4 SCOTUS ruling in United States v Windsor in 2012, same-sex marriage advocates and the ACLU have argued in lower courts across the nation that the case applies to states' power to ban same-sex marriage; the argument… [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 2:06 pm
The case is Davis v. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 10:07 am
Hertfordshire County Council v Davies (2020) EWHC 838 (QB) An application on the issue of notice under CPR 83.13(8) on permission to issue a High Court writ. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 2:55 pm
" [Just to state the obvious, this isn't my kind of website. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:16 pm
Further, the reply affidavit stated that it was being filed for the limited purpose of opposing the interim relief. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:16 pm
Further, the reply affidavit stated that it was being filed for the limited purpose of opposing the interim relief. [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 4:41 pm
Fortunately, SCOTUSblog has posts to keep everyone up on the sentencing excitement at the High Court tomorrow. [read post]
5 May 2009, 12:30 pm
Although there have been many films about law and lawyers, only a few actual High Court cases have reached the big screen. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:06 pm
The Court noted that Justice Sotomayor, in United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
(Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1172 – read judgment This application raises a significant issue about the treatment of vulnerable asylum-seekers and their children following certification of their claim as clearly unfounded. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 11:49 am
The leading case on the point was a decision of the Delhi High Court, Omni India v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 10:30 am
Tricome v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 7:07 pm
State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 2:50 pm
But if the state can't prove that fact, then the statute does indeed violate the free speech rights of the LSAC. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 6:04 am
United States v. [read post]
