Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges" Results 5941 - 5960 of 9,823
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2022, 3:50 am by Kyle Hulehan
Or how to design an inflation adjustment mechanism in Idaho? [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: CAFC greatly limits software and business method patents: In re Bilksi (The IP ADR Blog) (Techdirt) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Hal Wegner) (Law360) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (PLI) (PLI) (Patently-O) (Patent Prospector) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 5:01 am by Schachtman
In the face of her credentials, the MDL trial judge retreated to the usual chestnuts that are served up when a Rule 702 challenge is denied. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Part II: Bans on advertisers’ own speech The court—now Judge Clay is back to speaking for the unanimous panel again—turned to restrictions on speech about “modified risk” tobacco products. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 10:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  This does push TM law to change too.McKenna: agrees that this was a change in marketing that courts were noticing.Litman: just doesn’t agree with the idea that TM law was “designed” to cut retailers out; maybe a wording issue.McGeveran: consumer v. producer orientation is really important. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Second: the transformation of “transformative” use, coined by Judge Leval. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 4:01 pm
"Wrote Fifth Circuit Judge Jerry E. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:38 am by Matthew David Brozik
Judges Droney and Gleeson made a point of acknowledging that Aereo’s set-up seems evidently designed specifically to be legal, insofar as the law was lain down by the 2008 decision of the Second Circuit in Cartoon Network v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by Claire Hill
A federal judge temporarily blocked the implementation of a U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 5:12 am by Simon Lester
The Appellate Body has a tendency to re-do the panel reasoning on most issues that are appealed. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 8:39 am
They don't establish a binding or even presumptive amount of support; in fact, the Judge can completely ignore them.More than that, these local guidelines were only really designed for establishing "pendente lite" spousal support-- basically, temporary spousal support to be paid until the divorce is finalized. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:31 am by SHG
As USciences did here, universities often urge the judge not to second-guess their guilty findings, claiming that they’re acting in an “educational” capacity. [read post]
21 Jan 2017, 11:03 am by Gene Killian
  Poor loss control also puts you at the mercy of judges, many of whom (forgive me) don’t really understand how insurance works, and don’t really want to understand, because they’re way too busy. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:36 am by Simon Chester
Nous n’avons pas les dernières lettres envoyées par Proust. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 7:30 am by Jonathan Bailey
Thanks to fair use and one judge it came all the same. [read post]