Search for: "Million v State" Results 5941 - 5960 of 24,661
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2019, 7:43 am by Dan Bressler
“Boston Firm Gets $1.2M In Trade Secret Dispute With Ex-Attys” — “A Massachusetts law firm specializing in asbestos and toxic tort litigation has won nearly $1.2 million in its suit alleging that several former attorneys stole its trade secrets and started a rival firm, after a state jury returned a verdict in its favor. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 6:59 am by David J. Halberg, Esq.
The verdict includes: $3.6 million in prior medical expenses; $1 million in lost earnings $25 million in non-economic damages (pain and suffering, loss of consortium, etc.) $200 million in future damages In Byrom v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:54 am by Andrei Gribakov
Just this month, the U.K. data protection agency announced its intent to fine British Airways $232 million; this would dwarf the current $57 million record fine against Google in January 2019. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:58 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
… Congestion and accidents became a significant problem on North American roads that were crowded with more than 20 million horses. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
A variety of personal data contained in approximately 339 million guest records globally were exposed by the incident. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 3:42 am
Securities Industry Commentator: A legal, regulatory, and compliance feed curated by veteran Wall Street lawyer Bill Singer http://www.rrbdlaw.com/4696/securities-industry-commentator/United States of America, Appellee, v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 11:01 am by Vishnu Kannan
District Court for the District of Columbia’s ruling in United States of America v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
On 2 July 2019, Advocate General (AG) Bobek delivered his opinion in Case C-240/18 P Constantin Film Produktion GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), advising that the EUIPO’s decision to reject the registration of the trade mark ‘Fack Ju Göhte’ because it was too offensive should be annulled. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 7:08 am by Marty Lederman
 * * * *The Supreme Court explained, in the second of its ACA cases (King v. [read post]