Search for: "North v. State"
Results 5941 - 5960
of 13,338
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2016, 6:01 am
In 1997, the North Carolina Court of Appeals (Bess v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 4:33 am
Monday’s argument agenda also included State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 8:36 am
In Seeger v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 6:30 am
Supreme Court case Pierce v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 5:30 am
The State Comptroller sustained the Hearing Officer’s determination** and Captain Bevilacqua appealed the Comptroller’s decision.The Appellate Division sustained the Comptroller’s determination, explaining that “[e]ven accepting [Captain Bevilacqua’s] testimony, the Hearing Officer concluded that [Captain Bevilacqua], who grew up in the area and described the porch as ‘one of those big old North Buffalo porches,’ should have reasonably… [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 4:56 am
Yesterday, the court heard arguments in State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 11:47 am
My colleague Jennifer Granick notes that existing case law supports this interpretation (she points to https://casetext.com/case/oce-north-america-inc-v-mcs-services as one example), and argues therefore that Item 5 advise prosecutors what the law is and how not to bring a case that will lose for an existing reason already enforced by the courts. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 8:01 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 8:01 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 1:03 pm
The Weiner investigation revolves around the ex-congressman’s personal communications in early 2016 with a 15-year old girl from North Carolina, three years after Abedin and Secretary Clinton stopped working for the State Department. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 12:59 pm
The North Carolina Court of Appeals recently issued an opinion on a somewhat similar fact pattern in State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 12:59 pm
The North Carolina Court of Appeals recently issued an opinion on a somewhat similar fact pattern in State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 10:34 am
North Carolina: Whether, under the court’s First Amendment precedents, a law that makes it a felony for any person on the state's registry of former sex offenders... [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 7:07 am
The state appellate court court agreed, holding that the Internet disclosure provision was unconstitutional both on its face and as applied to defendant, but the Illinois Supreme Court overturned that decision and upheld the statute.* * This case is a close cousin of the case (North Carolina v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 6:18 am
Operation Technology, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 4:30 am
The first is Fry v. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm
Collins, who represents Yorkshire and North Lincolnshire, had claimed three MPs knew about child exploitation in the town but did nothing to intervene. [read post]
29 Oct 2016, 8:44 am
Packingham v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 9:30 pm
“Retired Oregon State University professor of history William G. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 3:44 pm
North Carolina involving the constitutionality of a state statute, NCGS § 14-202.5, making it a felony for... [read post]
