Search for: "Sides v. Beene"
Results 5941 - 5960
of 25,494
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2019, 1:24 am
The case of Deichmann SE v EUIPO concerned the registration of a trademark involving a cross design on the side of a shoe, where the shoe itself was marked using dotted lines to illustrate the position of the mark (EUTM 2923852). [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 12:20 am
"Noting that PERB had not ruled that the subject of the dispute -- paid leave for absences for a religious observance -- was a "prohibited subject of negotiations," the Court concluded that "once both sides do bargain and agree on a permissive subject [of negotiations], their accord is as binding and enforceable as if the subject had been one of required negotiations. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:49 am
It looks like the case is over.The case is TW v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 3:39 am
” At Balkinization, Mark Tushnet weighs in on Christie v. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 7:13 am
(Maxwell v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 6:12 am
By Lisa Whittaker Relying on Ohio’s public policy favoring workplace safety, the Tenth District Court of Appeals in Blackburn v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 8:41 am
Corp. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 3:44 am
It was unfortunate that "Mini One Cooper Gearbox" was plainly situated above the statement "Welcome to Independent Gearbox Centre" in smaller print: if that had been the other way around, so that the trading name was clearly "Independent Gearbox Centre" and it had stated below it that the website offered reconditioned gearboxes suitable for Mini One and Cooper cars, no doubt the use of the sign MINI would fall on the right side of the law. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 5:00 am
The district court sided with the Bank, and the plaintiff appealed. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:40 am
This decision comes in the case of Carrera v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 2:42 pm
In passing, platinum filaments had been tried before Edison, AND light bulbs came to be filled by inert gas, not vacuum. [read post]
alleged "misinformation campaign" about micro-irrigation firm is enough to survive motion to dismiss
15 Jun 2022, 12:15 pm
Netafim Irrigation, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 11:40 am
Yesterday was the 50th anniversary of the day in 1963 when the United State Supreme Court issued its landmark ruling of Brady v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 5:08 am
” Copyright experts side with broadcasters in Aereo fight — This week, amici supporting broadcasters in ABC v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 6:50 am
See, e.g., Katie Van et al. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 8:41 am
In Missouri v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 10:23 pm
And I know that means any bill generated by one side will inspire knee-jerk suspicion from the other side. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 11:20 am
Supreme Court decision in Daubert v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 10:35 am
In DeMarco v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 10:37 am
” Last week, in Cypress Point Condominium Ass’n v. [read post]
