Search for: "State v. C. R." Results 5941 - 5960 of 13,583
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2014, 6:39 am by Joy Waltemath
Noting that the city’s program met the exception in Sec. 553.226(b)(1), because it was required by state law when considering the employees’ actual duties and not just their titles, the appeals court found that they, in fact, devoted half of their time as paramedics after they obtained their certification (Misewicz v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 6:38 am by Joy Waltemath
The Board of County Commissioners of Jefferson County, Colorado, November 13, 2014, McHugh, C.). [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:34 am by Peter Mahler
Over 100 years ago, in Lord v Hull, 178 NY 9 [1904], the New York Court of Appeals — the state’s highest court — drew upon English common law to establish what has become a bedrock principle of American partnership law, that courts generally will not entertain lawsuits between partners except in the setting of a dissolution or final accounting. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 2:15 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, heard 29-30 April. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 5:08 am by Dean Freeman
Additional Resources: More Plaintiffs in Hepatitis C Lawsuit Against North Dakota Nursing Home, Oct. 13, 2014, By Blake Nicholson, Insurance Journal More Blog Entries: Boler v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:45 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD; the Court ruled by a 4-1 majority that the executive’s decision to bar Mrs Rajavi’s admission into the UK on grounds that it would not be conducive to the public good was rational and Secretary of State had not underrated the appellants’ ECHR, art 10 rights or overstated the risk. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 6:39 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In a recent Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas decision in the case of An v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:17 am
Tuesday afternoon I had the pleasure of debating/discussing King v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
This would appear to be a strange result (and goes against eg Case T-152/07 Lange Uren v OHIM). [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 5:15 pm by John C. Manoog III
Related Blog Posts $73.4 Million Jury Verdict Rendered Against Massachusetts Manufacturer of Pelvic Mesh Device: Salazar v. [read post]