Search for: "State v. Money" Results 5941 - 5960 of 20,506
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2015, 12:00 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The 7th amendment, believe it or not, does not apply in state courts. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 12:04 pm by John L. Culhane, Jr.
The consent order states that Security Group owned and operated approximately 900 locations in 20 states. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:00 am by INFORRM
She argued the meaning that the court ascribed to the words complained of (that Banks had received Russian money, or lied about receiving Russian money) was not what she intended. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 8:52 am by John Jascob
Fourth, the victim was an Ohio state agency holding money in trust for Ohio citizens, and fifth, the fraudulent conduct took place in the U.S. [read post]
24 Nov 2017, 6:30 am by John Jascob
The federal district court in Dallas summarily rejected the defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court’s decision in Kokesh v. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 10:00 pm
Trademark law states that "[a] product's color standing alone may qualify for trademark protection.Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 7:08 pm by Brian Shiffrin
The court noted that there are unusual circumstances in which silence will be admissible (People v Rothschild, 35 NY2d 355 [1974] [defendant police officer had a duty to report to his supervisors if he was taking the bribe money as part of a "sting"]; People v Savage, 50 NY2d 673 [1980] [defendant told police he shot victim during an altercation, properly cross-examined on his failure to make claim that victim was trying to rob him, as he testified at trial]). [read post]