Search for: "BARRETT" Results 5961 - 5980 of 6,529
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2010, 12:15 pm by Erin Miller
Barrett recently noted, Wirtz wrote the Justice about “John Stevens, one of our prospective graduates. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 8:14 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
That was the pinnacle of coolness – even better than color-coordinated ribbon braided barrettes. [read post]
18 May 2023, 3:28 am by Seán Binder
” Devlin Barrett reports for the Washington Post. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Indeed, one imagines that Trump’s appointees—Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett—would be especially uncomfortable about being seen as doing a favor for the man who put them where they are. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 4:31 pm by Benson Varghese
Justice Barrett (concurring): She clarifies that historical analogues need not be exact matches, but should reveal principles consistent with the challenged law. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 4:45 am by Jeff Nowak
Hat tip: Special thanks to my Littler colleagues, Casey Kurtz and Michelle Barrett Falconer, who offered these recommendations in one of their fabulous presentations last year! [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 4:42 am by Philip Mousavizadeh
” Devlin Barrett and Yvone Wingett Sanchez report for the Washington Post. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
” (16) Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett, “a Catholic working mother of seven, is just the sort of model of the ‘feminine genius’ to which … devout women might aspire rather than looking to the secular model of feminism, with its emphasis on social and economic equality for men and women. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:44 pm
ReferencesAngulo FJ, Baker NL, Olsen SJ, Anderson A, Barrett TJ. (2004). [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:44 pm by Ilya Somin
Barrett Prettyman ruled against the condemnation and emphasized that the "extension… of the concept of eminent domain" demanded by  the condemning authority was "dangerous to basic principles of our system of government. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 7:01 am by Reed Benson
In a 7-1 decision (with Justice Amy Coney Barrett not participating because she joined the court after the case was argued), the court upheld a determination of the Pecos River Master, who was appointed by the court itself to oversee implementation of its decree issued in 1988 after previous rounds in this long-running litigation. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:26 am by Amy Howe
Justice Amy Coney Barrett pressed Sher on his argument that a case hasn’t been removed “pursuant to” the federal-officer or civil-rights removal statute “unless it has been correctly removed” under those grounds. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:30 am by Minyao Wang
”  Sotomayor’s concurring opinion In an opinion joined by Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Elena Kagan, and Justice Amy Coney Barrett (a highly unusual ideological line-up for sure), Sotomayor would have adopted, consistent with the position of the Biden administration, consumer confusion as the focus of the Lanham Act. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:38 pm by Jeff Gamso
*Then there was AUSA Jesse Barrett who looked at the evidence, determined that he'd charged an innocent man with a crime, and promptly moved to have the charges dismissed.And Nicole Habersang who tried, with less than raging success, to dismiss the charges against Virgil Richardson because they were bullshit but the judge said that the interests of justice required the  continued prosecution of a man the state believed innocent.And there were the prosecutors in Pinal and Yavapai… [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 7:21 pm by Ilya Somin
In Taylor, a 7-1 majority (the just-confirmed new Justice Amy Coney Barrett did not participate), concluded that the lower court had gone too far in granting qualified immunity to prison officials in an egregious case where they subjected a prisoner to horrific treatment:  …Trent Taylor is an inmate in the custody of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
” He said it would be permissible for states or Congress to enact a workplace vaccine mandate while denying that Congress had delegated the power to do so to OHSA (or, in the Medicare/Medicaid case in which these Justices plus Justice Barrett dissented, to the Secretary of Health and Human Services).The “who decides” framing was hardly the knockout blow that Justice Gorsuch thought it was. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 10:47 am by Jamelle C. Sharpe
Justice Amy Coney Barrett returned to this concern several times, seeking clarification on whether the court could adopt an issue-exhaustion requirement even if its reading of the INA excluded one. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 10:22 am
HURST and DEVLIN BARRETT=====[www.wnd.com]State preps to relocate quarantined H1N1 victims'Your home and other less restrictive alternatives are not acceptable'Posted: August 31, 2009=====[tinyurl.com][thebirdflupandemic.com]for-refusing-the-swine-flu- vaccine-in-massachusettsMassachusetts' "Pandemic Response Bill" 2028.$1000 Per Day Fine And 30 Days In Jail For Refusing The Swine Flu Vaccine InMassachusetts? [read post]