Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 5961 - 5980
of 12,894
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2015, 4:58 pm
The more a contractor’s employees know about where they stand in terms of their pay within the company, the more the employees should feel that they have a stake in the company and its financial success, the OFCCP reasons. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 6:30 am
An MA Plan offers the same coverages found under Parts A and B, but has the added benefit of a prescription drug plan and additional coverage options provided through a private insurance company. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 3:05 am
In Dirks, the Supreme Court held that, under the “classical theory” of insider trading liability,[ii] tippers are liable—and, by extension, tippees are liable—only when tippers breach a duty to the shareholders of a publicly traded company. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 1:18 pm
The kit assembler exception provides an important avenue for certain companies to qualify as “small” under federal set aside contracts for manufactured products. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 12:02 pm
Yes, but barely. c. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 12:02 pm
Yes, but barely. c. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 9:24 am
Company point of contact information (address, position, telephone, email) c. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 4:30 am
Since this is just a few days before the President leaves office, if you vote wrong this order will not have much chance to actually go into effect.LGBT discrimination: Gender identity discrimination by contractors is now illegal, along with sexual orientation discrimination.$10.10 minimum wage: Starting January 1, 2016, contractors must pay $10.10/hour as a minimum wage, and $5.85/hour to tipped employees.Right to work for a successor company: For service contracts of $150,000 and up, if a… [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 9:57 pm
The company, and Chris Roberts, are almost certainly public figures, or at least limited-purpose public figures in the gaming world. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 5:35 am
(b) An insurance company bail bond. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 5:14 pm
C/B 2/14PK. 34251 5OZ.PRIN. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:40 pm
§ 1125(c))• Count V - Federal Cybersquatting - ACPA and Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:29 pm
And if the Rule of Two is satisfied, the VA must award the contract either on the basis of restricted competition or on a sole-source basis (if subsection (b) or (c) is satisfied as well). [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 3:15 pm
§ 42.20(c). [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 5:00 am
Elisse B. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:25 pm
Section 21177(b) “requires that the petitioner must have objected to the project on some ground before the agency made its decision. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 1:09 pm
At the same time, in Gunn (2013) the Supreme Court contracted Federal Circuit jurisdiction to cases where (1) federal patent law creates the cause of action or (2) where, although the claim arises under state law, that a federal patent law issue is: (a) necessarily raised, (b) actually disputed, (c) substantial, and (d) capable of resolution in federal court without disrupting the federal-state balance approved by Congress. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 11:14 am
She (a) held that TRA did not infringe Kantar’s patents, (b) dismissed TRA’s misappropriation claim as a discovery sanction, (c) ruled that TRA’s allegedly confidential information did not constitute trade secrets, (d) held that TRA submitted insufficient evidence to support a claim for damages, and (e) denied TRA’s requests for injunctive relief relating to allegations of a breach of fiduciary duty and for a jury trial on compensatory damages. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:29 am
Among other requirements, to obtain “prior express written consent,” a company must: (1) obtain a signed written agreement from the consumer, and (2) provide “clear and conspicuous” disclosures that: (a) the signatory agrees to receive autodialed or prerecorded marketing communications; and (b) providing consent is not a condition of purchase of any goods or services. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2] Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4] At the… [read post]
