Search for: "Fields v. A S" Results 5961 - 5980 of 17,272
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2016, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
 This 48 chapter volume is a comprehensive guide to topics in the fields of epistemology and metaphysics of medicine. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 2:56 pm
It all begins with some sort of encounter with law enforcement, possibly a traffic violation which, according to Terry v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 9:55 am by James Innocent
My colleague Jeffrey Carr addressed Goodyear’s transgressions in the case of Haeger v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
This is its newsletter dealing with recent developments  in the field. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:05 am by SHG
Parsing the Supreme Court’s opinion in Kisor v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 4:50 am by Evan M. Levow
The Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court issued a ruling several months ago in State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 11:31 am by Daniel Cappetta
Specifically, Camblin’s attorney filed a motion in limine to exclude the Alcotest results on the ground that the test was scientifically unreliable under Daubert v. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 11:33 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Reminds IPBiz a bit of Game 7 of Mets v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 12:56 pm by Susan Brenner
A lay witness is distinguished from an expert testimony, who testifies based upon their qualifications of expertise in their field. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 11:48 am
Reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court, New Westminster Registry, (Runghen v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 11:02 am by David Kopel
(David Kopel) The First Department of the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court has ruled 5-0 against NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s soda ban, in the case of  In re New York Statewide Coalition of Hispanic Chambers of Commerce, et al. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 8:28 am by Gene Quinn
Despite what the United States Patent and Trademark Office suggested in their initial guidance to patent examiners, the Supreme Court’s decision in Alice v. [read post]