Search for: "IN RE CASE MINORS" Results 5961 - 5980 of 12,194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
If you're a US patent applicant, it seems like enormously large claim sets are the way to go. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 1:58 pm by Rick
United States (1935) 295 U.S. 78, 88 [55 S.Ct. 629, 79 L.Ed. 1314] so as to avoid minor transcription errors in the Carney transcript.) [read post]
1 Mar 2025, 8:20 am by Eric Goldman
The Ninth Circuit, in a divided ruling, affirms. * * * For shits-and-giggles, the majority decides to (re?) [read post]
25 May 2011, 2:52 pm by Timothy B. Lee
Still others contain the names of witnesses, jurors, plaintiffs, and one minor. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 5:26 am by SHG
We like these goals, and so we overlook the means by which they’re achieved. [read post]
20 May 2014, 12:57 pm by Judy Selby
  In re: Science Applications International Corp. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 8:25 am by Daniel Richardson
 Because no two cases are ever identical, each new one demands that a court constantly re-examine its earlier rules and either (a) re-draw the line to accommodate the new case, or (b) keep the line unchanged and explain why.In today’s decision, the SCOV, with considerable help from the SCOTUS-above, opted to re-draw a few pivotal lines in the areas of the right to confrontation, self-defense, and the diminished capacity defense. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 6:32 am by Elizabeth McCuskey
“[O]n the other hand,” he mused, the failure to include an important warning “will hurt that minority” of patients susceptible to that side-effect. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 4:08 am by SHG
  Few do, regardless of whether they're innocent or guilty, which should also come as no shock. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
For many cases, that will leave relatively minor offenses like trespass or unlawful entry. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Steve McConnell
Instead, it was a guy who played a relatively minor role on the case. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 8:06 am by Jill Family
  In 2007, in a case called In re Escobar, the BIA refused to extend Cuevas-Gaspar by prohibiting imputation from parent to minor child to fulfill the requirement that the non-citizen seeking cancellation of removal have been a lawful permanent resident for at least five years. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 1:44 pm
We're politically progressive and almost casually multicultural. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:25 pm by INFORRM
re v Romania ((2005) 41 EHRR 200, [91]), in each case without any analysis of the point. [read post]