Search for: "Label v Label"
Results 5961 - 5980
of 13,306
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2014, 6:00 pm
Teller v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:13 pm
For example in another case, Wyeth v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 1:28 pm
The only thing I can think of is some sort of focus-group or similar research study as to the effect of graphics v. words on the human brain, tracked over the long term for links to behavioral choices. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 6:29 am
The Bad: Coincidently, in another case involving a putative consumer fraud class claim over depictions of fruits on a label, Judge Gorton of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in Wiley v. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 3:43 am
Roederer v J Garcia Carrion S.A. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 1:22 pm
In 2015, in Avneri v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 6:27 am
Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
[Orin Kerr] Byrd v. United States: The Supreme Court Takes a Broad View of Fourth Amendment Standing
15 May 2018, 4:12 am
As I see it, that test seems to replicate what Katz already does, putting a new label on the same work. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:49 pm
Cal.); Harris v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:26 am
PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 8:27 am
Graham v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 10:57 am
Oracle America and Andy Warhol Foundation v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
The Rothman brief does make the salutary point that labeling a study outcome as not “statistically significant” carries the danger that the study’s data have no value, or that the study may be taken to reject the hypothesized association. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:29 am
Labeling was also granted judicial notice in: Horne v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:57 pm
by its mRNA (the encoding gene) in T-cell and B-cell lymphomas, and (v) the information that Neutrokine-? [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:46 am
In Bullcoming v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 5:12 am
Thomas v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 3:00 am
The ICRC, of course, is bound by its mandates of confidentiality and neutrality not to take sides, and labeling a particular use of force “unlawful” inevitably results in a legal assessment that one side (at least) was improper in its resort to violence. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 5:30 am
Is King v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 1:26 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
