Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 5961 - 5980 of 178,423
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2010, 5:34 am by The Docket Navigator
The magistrate judge recommended granting defendant's alternative motion to transfer venue of plaintiff's false marking case to the defendant's home venue. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 6:37 am
Plaintiff's lawyer in one of the New Jersey class actions filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class action lawsuits pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 6:30 am
Those Riverside materials include, but are not limited to, Plaintiff Exhibit No. 39, 2003 nursing textbook from Riverside’s own School of Practical Nursing (L.P.N); Plaintiffs Exhibit No. 47, 2003 nursing textbook from its own School of Professional Nursing (R.N.); Plaintiffs Exhibit No. 33, JCAHO Prep 2004 CBL; Plaintiff Exhibit No. 36, Riverside’s “Patient Restraints,” CBL and;… [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 12:20 pm by John S. Moffa
Rosenthal, the plaintiff filed suit against his physician after a radio frequency ablation (RFA) procedure on the plaintiffs minor son’s leg. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jane Coleman
Court: “The school’s policy is a trifecta of harm”—it harms the students, it harms the parents, and it harms the plaintiffs "who are compelled to violate the parent’s rights by forcing plaintiffs to conceal information they feel is critical for the welfare of their students---violating plaintiffs’ religious beliefs. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 10:14 pm by Lyrissa Lidsky
  The district judge likewise determined that "the prejudice to the defendants and the public's interest in open courts outweighs plaintiffs' fears of harm. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 2:57 pm by Gregory J. Brodzik
Judge Sleet further noted that plaintiffs proposed amendments “do not contradict its prior pleadings,” and that defendants may challenge plaintiffs allegations. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:03 am by John Steele
Martin, and, as has happened before, the plaintiff mistakenly thought that the statute wouldn't start running until a subsequent ruling from the court had come down. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
 According to the Opinion, the Plaintiffs wife was finishing checking out in a retail store while the Plaintiff-husband went out to get the couple’s vehicle. [read post]
28 May 2024, 4:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
In employment discrimination cases where a defendant-employer articulates a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the employment action, the plaintiff has the burden then shifts to the plaintiff-employee to establish that the employer’s reason was a pretext for discrimination, i.e., the defendant’s reason for, say, terminating the plaintiffs employment is false. [read post]
10 Apr 2021, 10:06 am by Gregory B. Williams
April 8, 2021), the Court denied Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs false advertising claims under the Lanham Act and the Delaware Deceptive Trade Practices Act (“DTPA”) after finding that genuine issues of material fact preclude summary judgment or that the asserted claims do not fail as a matter of law. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 4:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
According to the Opinion, the State Farm policy provided coverage for accidental and direct physical loss to, among other things, the in-ground swimming pool on the Plaintiffs property. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
.), the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled that a Plaintiff in a motorcycle accident case was prejudiced by the trial court’s admission of evidence of the Plaintiffs alcohol consumption as there were no signs that the Plaintiff was intoxicated at the time of the crash. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 8:50 am
Tenenbaum, the plaintiffs have opposed the motion for internet access due to defendant's having not disclosed the specific URL's and programs he wishes to demonstrate. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:51 pm by Kenan Farrell
Village Pantry LLC Court Case Number: 1:12-cv-01252-RLY-DKL File Date: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 Plaintiff: Noble Roman’s Inc. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 8:23 pm
In Rahman, plaintiff alleged that Mott’s 100% Apple Juice is improperly [...] [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 12:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  As detailed in greater length here, plaintiffs filed the suit after the company’s share price declined following the disclosure of a U.S. [read post]