Search for: "Sell v. Sell" Results 5961 - 5980 of 23,637
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2018, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
(Read @yashalevine exce… 2018-07-23 Fake News Comes to Canada: Misleading Headlines and Distortion of the Facts Regarding the Fight Against Copyright I… https://t.co/jzfaNEXYdX 2018-07-23 RT @neilturkewitz: @daniellecitron @benjaminwittes So powerful & on target: “The free expression calculus devised by the law’s supporters o… 2018-07-23 Computer and Internet Updates for 2018-07-23 https://t.co/OrUuGRPoMw 2018-07-24 Computer and Internet Updates for… [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 12:04 am by Public Employment Law Press
§827 of the Public Authorities Law mandates that two members of the three-person board "must be persons engaged in farming who derive a greater part of their income therefrom and who actually sell all or part of their produce on the [Central New York Regional] Market. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 1:21 pm by Seth Fortin
  That was the question facing the Southern California federal district court in deciding a motion for a preliminary injunction in Founder Starcoin v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:15 am by Eric Goldman
Section 110(c)(5) should be deleted. 1798.120(d): The language is inconsistent about 16 year olds (or, if you read the restriction as applying only to 14 and 15 year olds, then it’s inconsistent about 13 year olds): “a business shall not sell the personal information of consumers if the business has actual knowledge that the consumer is less than 16 years of age, unless the consumer, in the case of consumers between 13 and 16 years of age, or the consumer’s parent or… [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:02 pm by Erin F. Fonté and Ferdose al-Taie
The Federal Trade Commission has brought several enforcement actions touching on cryptocurrency under the FTC’s Section 5 “Unfair and Deceptive Acts and Practices” enforcement authority, including one for deceptive sale of goods related to cryptocurrency mining (F.T.C. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 7:26 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
         Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]