Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 5961 - 5980
of 15,316
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2017, 9:31 am
Strip Search Cases, 461 F.3d 219, 225 (2d Cir. 2006) (finding that “a court may employ Rule 23(c)(4)(A) to certify a class on a particular issue even if the action as a whole does not satisfy Rule 23(b)(3)’s predominance requirement”), in favor of the contrary rule of Castano v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 2:00 pm
In a scathing decision in Abdulaali v Salih, he stated, 1. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 5:46 am
It’s style is, National Life & Accident Co. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:09 pm
Buckaloo v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 2:00 pm
”[28] V. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 10:12 am
Lebowitz asks the court to impose the remedy that was proposed on Monday under United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 5:26 am
§ 410 (c) states that, “[t]he evidentiary weight to be accorded the certificate of a registration made thereafter shall be within the discretion of the court. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 2:33 pm
To that end, it relied upon the Fifth Circuit’s 1995 unpublished ruling in Vega v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 11:31 am
Behrend, 133 S. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 11:15 am
The rule states the formal notice can be sent to the following parties: to the attorney representing an interested person; to an interested person who has filed a request for notice at the address given in the request for notice; to an incapacitated person or a person with a developmental disability to the person’s usual place of abode and to the person’s legal guardian, if any, at the guardian’s usual place of abode or regular… [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 10:16 am
See Macaluso v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 8:27 pm
Whitaker v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 3:01 pm
From Tuesday’s decision in O’Connor v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 12:57 pm
Shortly after I published last week’s post on State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 12:57 pm
Shortly after I published last week’s post on State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 12:03 pm
’ State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 10:52 am
Accordingly, Menon argues that, while Articles 10(b) and 10(c) concern service of process, Article 10(a) relates to mailing legal documents for other purposes, such as discovery. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 8:44 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 6:50 am
Agreeing in part, the state high court held that a new administrative hearing was required because “a putative employee’s work for other entities is a relevant, but not dispositive, factor in the totality of circumstances analysis” under part C. [read post]
